LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2016-3-102-106
Abstract
The shortage of donor organs leads to a gradual extension of the selection criteria for living donors including age and presence of comorbidities. Performing simultaneous operations with donor nephrectomy would further increase the number of living donors and increase the attractiveness of operations. In this observation, the examination of a 60-year-old potential donor revealed a concomitant disease: chronic calculous cholecystitis, which had existed for over 20 years. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen showed a strong adhesion of the bowel to the anterior abdominal wall. To prevent the risk of damage to the abdominal organs, it was decided to perform the nephrectomy retroperitoneoscopically and a simultaneous cholecystectomy from the same access. This procedure has three major advantages: no contact with the abdominal cavity when performing the access, the easiest access to the renal arteries, and the absence of a systematic increase in intraperitoneal pressure. Such access is of particular importance for the patients who have had previous interventions on the abdominal organs.
About the Authors
D. V. Perlin
Volgograd Regional Uronephrological Center, Voljsky;
Volgograd State Medical University, Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantology, Volgograd
Russian Federation
1, Pavshikh Bortsov sq., Volgograd, 400131
Russian Federation
1, Pavshikh Bortsov sq., Volgograd, 400131
I. V. Aleksandrov
Volgograd Regional Uronephrological Center, Voljsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. P. Zipunnikov
Volgograd Regional Uronephrological Center, Voljsky;
Volgograd State Medical University, Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantology, Volgograd
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. N. Dymkov
Volgograd Regional Uronephrological Center, Voljsky;
Volgograd State Medical University, Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantology, Volgograd
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ponticelli C, Kahan B. Principales and practice in renal transplantation. 3d ed. Philadelphia. P.A., WB Sanders. 2000: 245–258.
2. Norman DJ. The kidney transplant wit-list: allocation of patients to a limited supply of organs. Semin. Dial. 2005; 18: 456–459.
3. Delmonico FL, Dew МА. Living donor kidney transplantation in a global environment. Kidney Int. 2007; 71 (7): 608–614.
4. Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: An OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation. 2008 Mar 27; 85: 916–919.
5. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini SM. Moghaddam. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Urology International. 2005; 95 (6): 851–855.
6. Sutariya VK, Modi PR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed simultaneously with retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann. Trop. Med. Public. Health. 2016; 9: 102–104.
7. Johnson EM, Remucal MJ, Gillingham KJ et al. Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1124–1128.
8. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy – a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation. 1997 Jan 27; 63: 229–233.
9. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2005; 173: 38–41.
Review
For citations:
Perlin D.V., Aleksandrov I.V., Zipunnikov V.P., Dymkov I.N. LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2016;18(3):102-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2016-3-102-106
Views:
1225
Email this article 