REDUCING THE SEVERITY OF RENAL GRAFT ISCHEMIC AND REPERFUSION INJURY WITH COUPLED PLASMA FILTRATION AND ADSORPTION
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2015-4-33-39
Abstract
Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of coupled plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA) in reducing the severity of the renal graft ischemic and reperfusion injury. Materials and methods: shortand long-term results of renal transplantation in 33 pairs of recipients were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: in 33 recipients of the study group we performed CPFA in the early postoperative period. In the comparison group in 33 recipients with paired grafts CPFA was not performed. Results. The proportion of patients with good initial and delayed graft functions in the two groups was the same. In patients with delayed graft function from the study group a significantly greater rate of creatinine and urea decrease and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increase than in patients of the comparison group were observed. Among patients with good initial graft function the differences between the groups were not significant. We have also analyzed long-term results of the transplantations: patients who received CPFA in the early postoperative period had lower levels of creatinine, urea and daily proteinuria and higher GFR in 1 year time. Thus, as a result of CPFA in the early postoperative period the improvement of graft function and graft survival prognosis can be expected in the long-term.
About the Authors
A. V. Vatazin
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. B. Zulkarnaev
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. L. Shakhov
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. O. Kantaria
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. P. Faenko
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. Krstich
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. V. Belskich
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Yarlagadda SG, Klein CL, Jani A. Long-term renal outcomes after delayed graft function. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2008; 15 (3): 248–256.
2. Davenport A. The brain and the kidney-organ cross talk and interactions. Blood Purif. 2008; 26 (6): 526–536.
3. Honoré PM, Joannes-Boyau O, Gressens B. Blood and plasma treatments: the rationale of high-volume hemofiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 2007; 156: 387–395.
4. Jang HR, Rabb H. The innate immune response in ischemic acute kidney injury. Clin Immunol. 2009; 130 (1): 41–50.
5. Mohamed Ali AA, Abraham G, Mathew M et al. Can serial eGFR, body mass index and smoking predict renal allograft survival in south Asian patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009; 20 (6): 984–990.
6. He X, Moore J, Shabir S et al. Comparison of the predictive performance of eGFR formulae for mortality and graft failure in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2009; 87 (3): 384–392.
7. Marcén R, Morales JM, Fernández-Rodriguez A et al. Long-term graft function changes in kidney transplant recipients. NDT Plus. 2010; 3 (Suppl. 2). ii2–ii8.
8. Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ et al. The relationship between kidney function and long-term graft survival after kidney transplant. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 57 (3): 466–475.
9. Smith-Palmer J, Kalsekar A, Valentine W. Influence of renal function on long-term graft survival and patient survival in renal transplant recipients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014; 30 (2): 235–242.
10. Park JS, Oh IH, Lee CH et al. The rate of decline of glomerular filtration rate is a predictor of long-term graft outcome after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2013; 45 (4): 1438–1441.
11. Townamchai N, Praditpornsilpa K, Chawatanarat T et al. The validation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation for renal transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol. 2013; 79 (3): 206–213.
12. Talreja H, Akbari A, White CA et al. Predicting Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Using Proteinuria Ascertained From Spot Urine Samples Versus Timed Urine Collections. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 64 (6): 962–968.
13. Shamseddin MK, Knoll GA. Posttransplantation proteinuria: an approach to diagnosis and management. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 6 (7): 1786–1793.
14. Resende L, Guerra J, Santana A et al. First year renal function as a predictor of kidney allograft outcome. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41 (3): 846–848.
15. Lenihan CR, O'Kelly P, Mohan P et al. MDRD-estimated GFR at one year post-renal transplant is a predictor of long-term graft function // Ren Fail. 2008; 30 (4): 345–352.
16. Summers DM, Johnson RJ, Allen J et al. Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donated after cardiac death in the UK: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010; 376 (9749): 1303–1311.
17. Knoll GA. Proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients: prevalence, prognosis, and evidence-based management. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 54 (6): 1131–1144.
Review
For citations:
Vatazin A.V., Zulkarnaev A.B., Shakhov N.L., Kantaria R.O., Faenko A.P., Krstich M., Belskich L.V. REDUCING THE SEVERITY OF RENAL GRAFT ISCHEMIC AND REPERFUSION INJURY WITH COUPLED PLASMA FILTRATION AND ADSORPTION. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2015;17(4):33-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2015-4-33-39
Views:
1226
Email this article 