Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS FACTORS UPON DECISION ON PANCREAS ALLOGRAFT SUITABILITY

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2015-2-30-38

Abstract

AAim. To identify factors influencing upon decision on pancreas allograft suitability for transplant and their clinical significance. Materials and methods. We reviewed 95 multiorgan donors under the age of 45, who were considered as pancreas donor between January 2010 and December 2013. 28 pancreata were procured (Group I), 67 pancreata were refused (Group II). Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, anatomical hepatopancreatoduodenal varieties were taken into account. Results. We found that only three factors have an effect on pancreas allograft refusal probability. According to our data, non-transplantation of the liver from the same donor increases the pancreas graft refusal in 4 times. Elevated donor’s sodium and urea blood levels also increase the probability of donor pancreas denial for transplantation. For example, the probability of pancreas graft refusal from the donor with sodium level 145 mmol/l and urea level 6.0 mol/l is only 32%. As compared to the donor with sodium level 160 mmol/l and urea 12.0 mol/l where probability reaches 85%. Other factors: demographic, laboratory, clinical indicators, gepatopancreatoduodenal blood supply variations were not predictive for the procurement decision. Conclusion. Main predictors of pancreas allograft refusal to be taken into account, appropriate correction of donor metabolic disturbances and sufficient experience of the surgeon performing the procurement can increase the availability of pancreas transplantation. 

 

About the Authors

S. V. Arzumanov
N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation

 Sergey Arzumanov. Address: 51, 3-rd Parkovaya st., Moscow, 105425, Russian Federation. Tel.: (499) 164-10-64, (903) 255-59-06. E-mail: kidneytranspl@gmail.com.



Ya. G. Moysyuk
V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation


S. V. Gautier
V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Готье СВ. Сахарный диабет I типа, диабетическая нефропатия: возможности трансплантологии // Вестник РАМН. 2012; 1: 54–60. Gautier SV. Type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy: transplantology potential. Annals of the Russian academy of medical science. 2012; 1: 54–60.

2. Peyser T1, Dassau E, Breton M, Skyler JS. The artificial pancreas: current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2014 Apr; 1311: 102–123. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12431.

3. Maglione M, Ploeg RJ, Friend PJ. Donor risk factors, retrieval technique, preservation and ischemia/reperfusion injury in pancreas transplantation. Curr. Opin Organ Transplant. 2013 Feb; 18 (1): 83–88.

4. Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am. J. Transplant. 2006 Apr; 6 (4): 783–790.

5. Gruessner RW, Gruessner AC. The current state of pancreas transplantation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013 Sep; 9 (9): 555–562.

6. Stratta RJ, Bennett L. Pancreas underutilization according to united network for organ sharing data. Transplant. Proc. 1998 Mar; 30 (2): 264.

7. Vinkers MT, Rahmel AO, Slot MC et al. How to recognize a suitable pancreas donor: a Eurotransplant study of preprocurement factors. Transplant. Proc. 2008 Jun; 40 (5): 1275–1278.

8. Woeste G, Moench C, Hauser IA et al. Can the preprocurement pancreas suitability score predict ischemia-reperfusion injury and graft survival after pancreas transplantation? Transplant. Proc. 2010 Dec; 42 (10).

9. Axelrod DA, Sung RS, Meyer KH et al. Systematic evaluation of pancreas allograft quality, outcomes and geographic variation in utilization. Am. J. Transplant. 2010 Apr; 10 (4): 837–845.

10. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Hilling DE, Dirkes MC, Baranski AG. Surgical injuries of pancreatic allografts during procurement. Clin. Transplant. 2011 Sep–Oct; 25 (5): 737–743.

11. Schneeberger S, Biebl M, Steurer W et al. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine-tryptophane-ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2009 Feb; 22 (2): 217–224.

12. Drewitz K, Loss M, Loss J, Apfelbacher CJ. Predictors of non-transplantation of adult donor organs – an observational study using routine data from Eurotransplant. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014 Nov 25; 14 (1): 584.

13. Loss MI, Drewitz KP, Apfelbacher CJ et al. Why offered pancreases are refused in the allocation process-a descriptive study using routine data from eurotransplant. Transplantation. 2013 May 15; 95 (9): 1134–1141.


Review

For citations:


Arzumanov S.V., Moysyuk Ya.G., Gautier S.V. INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS FACTORS UPON DECISION ON PANCREAS ALLOGRAFT SUITABILITY. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2015;17(2):30-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2015-2-30-38

Views: 1515


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)