CONVECTIVE METHODS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF V.I. SHUMAKOV FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS: PAST AND PRESENT
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2014-3-85-92
Abstract
The experience of the introduction of convective methods since the eighties of the 20th century is described.
Aim: to evaluate the infl uence of convective transport supplementation on renal replacement therapy results.
Methods and results. The number of convective procedures was applied: hemodiafi ltration with commercial substituted fl uid, paired fi ltration dialysis, acetate-free biofi ltration, original hybrid methods, online hemodiafi ltration. The
main trend was the magnifi cation of substituted volume. In the long run after switching from conventional dialysis to convective therapy the increase of Kt/V, the decline of phosphate, the rise of serum albumin, the decrease of CRP level and ESA consumption, QOL improvement and the drop in severity of intradialysis complications were observed. Over last six years online hemodiafi ltration has become the standard of dialysis therapy in our Center.
Conclusion. The undoubted advantages of convective modalities and accessibility of online hemodiafi ltration make these methods the gold standard of dialysis therapy.
About the Authors
A. G. StrokovRussian Federation
head of hemodialysis unit, clinical transplantology department, V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artifi cial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Y. L. Poz
Russian Federation
leading research fellow, clinical transplantology department at the same center
Y. V. Kopylova
Russian Federation
nephrologist, hemodialysis unit, clinical transplantology department at the same center
K. N. Kryshin
Russian Federation
nephrologist at the same division
V. A. Terekhov
Russian Federation
nephrologist at the same division
V. A. Gavrilin
Russian Federation
nephrologist at the same division
I. V. Basiladze
Russian Federation
nephrologist at the same division
A. V. Kutuzova
Russian Federation
nephrologist at the same division
References
1. Lameire N, VanBiesen W, Vanholder R. Did 20 years of technological innovations in hemodialysis contribute to better patient outcomes? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4 (Suppl 1): S30–40. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04000609, PMID: 19996003.
2. Henderson LW, Beans E. Successful production of sterile pyrogen-free electrolyte solution by ultrafi ltration. Kidney Int. 1978; 14:522–525, PMID: 750697.
3. Ghezzi PM, Frigato G, Fantini GF. Theoretical model and fi rst clinical results of the paired fi ltration dialysis (PFD). Life Support System. 1983; 1 (suppl 1): 271–274, PMID: 6336427.
4. Kotov MV, Baeva LB, Strokov AG. Paired fi ltration-dialysis, acetate free biofi ltration, bicarbonate dialysis for treatment patients after kidney transplantation. XXXIV Congress of ERA-EDTA. Geneva, 1997; 148.
5. VanStone JC, Mitchell A. Hemodialysis with base-free dialysate. Proc Dialysis Transplant Forum. 1980; 10: 268–271, PMID: 6287452.
6. Zucchelli P, Santoro A, Raggiotto G, Degli Esposti E, Sturani A, Capecchi V. Biofi ltration in uremia: preliminary observations. Blood Purif. 1984; 2: 187–195, DOI: 10.1159/000169333.
7. Bene B, Bernard M, Perrone B, Simon P. Simultaneous dialysis and fi ltration with buffer-free dialysate. Blood Purif. 1985; 2: 217–222.
8. Котов МВ, Строков АГ, Поз ЯЛ, Баева ЛБ, Фролов АН. Схема одновременного проведения безацетатной биофильтрации двум пациентам. Медицинская техника. 1998; 3: 33–34. Kotov MV, Strokov AG, Poz YL, Baeva LB, Frolov AN. Skhema odnovremennogo provedeniya bezatsetatnoy biofi l'tratsii dvum patsientam. Meditsinskaya tekhnika. 1998; 3: 33–34.
9. Leber HW, Wizemann V, Goubeaud G, Rawer P, Schütterle G. Hemodiafi ltration: a new alternative to hemofi ltration and conventional hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 1978; 2: 150–153, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1978. tb03444.x.
10. Строков АГ, Поз ЯЛ, Котов МВ. Гемодиафильтрация с приготовлением замещающего раствора с помощью диализного аппарата без волюметрического контроля ультрафильтрации. Медицинская техника. 1990; 4: 33–34. Strokov AG, Poz YL, Kotov MV. Gemodiafi l'tratsiya s prigotovleniem zameshchayushchego rastvora s pomoshch'yu dializnogo apparata bez volyumetricheskogo kontrolya ul'trafi l'tratsii. Meditsinskaya tekhnika. 1990; 4: 33–34.
11. Строков АГ, Поз ЯЛ, Баева ЛБ, Левицкий ЭР, Анненков АЕ, Рудько ИА, Кубатиев АА. Об опыте многократного использования диализаторов. Терапевтический архив. 1994; 6: 60–65. Strokov AG, Poz YL, Baeva LB, Levitskiy ER, Annenkov AE, Rud'ko IA, Kubatiev AA. Ob opyte mnogokratnogo ispol'zovaniya dializatorov. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 1994; 6: 60–65.
12. Grooteman MPC, van den Dorpel MA, Bots ML, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, Mazairac AH et al. CONTRAST Investigators. Effect of Online Hemodiafi ltrationon All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 23: 1087–1096. DOI: 10.1681/ ASN.2011121140, PMID: 22539829.
13. Maduell F, Moreso F, Pons M, Ramos R, Mora-Macià J, Carreras J et al. ESHOL Study Group. High-effi ciency postdilution online hemodiafi ltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 24 (3): 487–497. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2012080875, PMID: 23411788.
Review
For citations:
Strokov A.G., Poz Y.L., Kopylova Y.V., Kryshin K.N., Terekhov V.A., Gavrilin V.A., Basiladze I.V., Kutuzova A.V. CONVECTIVE METHODS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF V.I. SHUMAKOV FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS: PAST AND PRESENT. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2014;16(3):85-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2014-3-85-92