Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

LAPAROSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE URINARY TRACT IN PATIENTS WITH URETERAL STRICTURE AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2013-3-32-37

Abstract

Aim. Ureteral obstruction secondary to ischemia is the most common urologic complication of kidney trans- plantation. Pyeloureteral anastomosis with recipient ureter has shown most satisfactory long-term results in its management. Existing urinary infection and immunosupression determine the high risk of wound complications. We have experience more than 50 reconstructive procedures of urinary tract after kidney transplantation by open surgery during 25 years. Till last time this procedure has been performed through open surgery. Method. We used pyeloureteral anastomosis with recipient ureter in two patients with ureteral stricture after kidney transplantation by laparoscopic approach. The operations lasted 215 and 275 min respectively. In both cases the surgery was per- formed after percutaneous nephrostomy because of deterioration of transplanted kidney function. Internal stent was indwelled laparoscopicaly. No drain tube was left. Results. The nephrostomy tubes were removed after 10 and 7 days respectively. The stents were removed after 27 and 20 days respectively. No complications were seen during the surgery and postoperative period. Now serum creatinine level is 0.12 mmol/l and 0.15 mmol/l after 15 and 12 months after surgery respectively. Conclusion. In spite of some difficulties related with topographic land- marks and severe tissues fibrosis after transplantation laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy in transplanted kidney is safe and feasible procedure. The main advantage is absence of risk of most serious complications related with wound infection in immune compromised patients. Moreover, early recovery to usual activity and diet facilita- tes to prevent pulmonary infections and to normalize intestinal absorbability of the immunosuppressive drugs. 

About the Authors

D. V. Perlin
Volgograd Hospital Center of Urology and Nephrology (Head – dokt. of med. sci. Perlin D.V.), Voljsky, Russian Federation Chair of Urology, State Medical University of Volgograd (Head – academician of RAMSci, prof. V.I. Petrov), Volgograd, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


I. V. Alexandrov
Volgograd Hospital Center of Urology and Nephrology (Head – dokt. of med. sci. Perlin D.V.), Voljsky, Russian Federation Chair of Urology, State Medical University of Volgograd (Head – academician of RAMSci, prof. V.I. Petrov), Volgograd, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


G. M. Zolotarev
Volgograd Hospital Center of Urology and Nephrology (Head – dokt. of med. sci. Perlin D.V.), Voljsky, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


O. N. Shevchenko
Volgograd Hospital Center of Urology and Nephrology (Head – dokt. of med. sci. Perlin D.V.), Voljsky, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Trapeznikova M.F., Filipcev P.Ja., Perlin D.V., Kulach- kov S.M. Lechenie striktur mochetochnika posle trans- plantacii pochki. Urologija i nefrologija. 1994; 3: 42–45 (in rus).

2. Streem S.B., Novick A.C., Steinmuller D.R. Percutaneous techniques for the management of urological renal trans- plant complications. J. Urol. 1986. 135: 456–459.

3. Yong A.A., Ball S.T., Pelling M. Management of ureteral strictures in renal transplants by antegrade balloon dila- tation and temporary internal stenting. Cardiovasc. Inter- vent. Radiol. 1999; 22 (5): 385–388.

4. Lopatkin N.A., Trapeznikova M.F., Perlin D.V., Uren- kov S.B. Urologicheskie oslozhnenija pri transplantacii pochki. M.: Geotar-Med, 2004:130–173 (in rus).

5. Lopatkin N.A., Perlin D.V., Darenkov S.P. Primenenie pieloureterostomii s sobstvennym mochetochnikom re- cipienta v lechenii urologicheskih oslozhnenij posle pe- resadki pochki. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennyh organov. 2001; 2: 35–38 (in rus).

6. Solomon L., Saporta F., Amsellem D. Results of pyelo- ureterostomy after ureterovesical anastomosis compli- cations in renal transplantation. Urology. 1999; 53 (5): 908–912.

7. Orvieto M., Chien G., Shalhav A. Case report: robot-as- sisted laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy in a transplanted kidney with ureteral stricture. J. Endourol. 2006; 20: 31–32.

8. Mahdavi A., Zafarghandi R., Taghavi R. Extensive ure- teral stricture after kidney transplantation: The assess- ment of risk factors and their effects on patient and graft survival. Eur. Urol. 2013; Feb.: 136.

9. Saidi R., Elias N., Hertl M. Urinary reconstruction after kidney transplantation: pyeloureterostomy or ureteroneo- cystostomy. J. Surg. Res. 2013. May 1; 181: 156–159.


Review

For citations:


Perlin D.V., Alexandrov I.V., Zolotarev G.M., Shevchenko O.N. LAPAROSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE URINARY TRACT IN PATIENTS WITH URETERAL STRICTURE AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2013;15(3):32-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2013-3-32-37

Views: 1524


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)