THE DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER ALLOGRAFT ACUTE REJECTION IN LIVER BIOPSIES
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-3-15-19
Abstract
We performed histological examination of 80 liver allograft biopsies, the diagnosis of acute rejection was proved in 34 cases. Histological changes in liver biopsies in different grades of acute rejection were estimated according to Banff classification 1995, 1997 and were compared with current literature data. The article deals with the question of morphological value of grading acute rejection on early and late, also we analyze changes in treat- ment tactics after morphological verification of liver allograft acute rejection.
About the Authors
L. V. Shkalova
Federal State Institution Volga Regional Medical Center of Federal Bio-Medical Agency, Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. P. Mogeiko
Academician V.I. Schumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. M. Iljinsky
Academician V.I. Schumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov First Moscow Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Y. G. Moysyuk
Academician V.I. Schumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov First Moscow Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. M. Tsirulnikova
Academician V.I. Schumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov First Moscow Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. V. Gautier
Academician V.I. Schumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov First Moscow Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Готье С.В., Константинов Б.А., Цирульникова О.М. Трансплантация печени // Руководство для врачей. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2008. 248 с.
2. Abraham S.C., Freese D.K., Ishitani M.B. et al. Signifi- cance of central perivenulitis in pediatric liver transplan- tation // Am. J. Surg. Patol. 2008. V. 32 (10). P. 1479– 1488.
3. Berenguer M., Rayon M., Prieto M. et al. Are post- transplantation protocol liver biopsies useful in the long- term? // Liver Transpl. 2001. Vol. 23. P. 234–241.
4. Demetris A.J., Ruppert K., Dvorchik I. et al. Real- time monitoring of acute liver allograft rejection using the Banff schema // Transplantation. 2002. V. 74 (9). P. 1290–1296.
5. Dixon L.R., Crawford J.M. Early histologic changes in fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis C // Liver Transplantation. 2007. V. 13 (2). P. 219–226.
6. Gornicka В., Ziarkiewicz-Wroblewskaa B., Bogdans- kaa M. et al. Pathomorphological Features of Acute Re- jection in Patients After Orthotopic Liver Transplantati- on: Own Experience // J. Transplantation Proceedings. 2006. V. 38 (1). P. 221 –225.
7. Gouv A.S., van den Heuvel M.C., van den Berg A.P., Sloff M.J. et al. Significance of parenchemymal changes of acute cellular rejection in predicting chronic liver graft rejection // Transplantation. 2002. V. 73 (2). P. 243–247.
8. Hassoun Z., Shah V., Lohse C.M., Pankratz V.S., Pet- rovic L.M. Centrilobular necrosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: association with acute cellular rejection and impact on outcome // Liver Transpl. 2004. V. 10 (4). P. 480–487.
9. Höroldt B.S., Burattin M., Gunson B.K. et al. Does the Banff rejection activity index predict outcome in pati- ents with early acute cellular rejection following liver transplantation? // Liver transplantation. 2006. V. 12 (7). P. 1144–1151.
10. Hubscher S.G. Transplantation pathology // Semin Liver Dis. 2009. V. 29 (1). P. 74–90.
11. International Panel. Banff schema for grading liver al- lograft rejection: an international consensus document // Hepatology. 1997. V. 25. P. 658–663.
12. InternationalWorkingParty.Terminologyforhepatical- lograft rejection // Hepatology. 1995. V. 22. P. 648–654.
13. Krasinskas A.M., Demetris A.J., Poterucha J.J., Abra-
14. ham S.C. The prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated central perivenulitis in adult allograft livers // Liver Transpl. 2008. V. 14 (5). P. 625–632.
15. Lovell M.O., Speeg K.V., Halff G.A., Molina D.K. et al. Acute hepatic allograft rejection: a comparison of pa- tients with and without centrilobular alterations during first rejection episode // Liver Transpl. 2004. V. 10 (3). P. 369–373.
16. Neil D.A.H., Hübscher S.G. Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation // Transplant Internati- onal. 2010. V. 23 (10). P. 971–983.
17. Regev A., Molina E., Moura R. et al. Reliability of histopa- thologic assessment for the differentiation of recurrent he- patitis C from acute rejection after liver transplantation // Liver Transplantation. 2004. V. 10 (10). P. 1233–1239.
18. Stravitz R.T., Shiffman M.L., Sanyal A.J. et al. Effects of interferon treatment on liver histology and allograft rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation // Liver Transpl. 2004. V. 10. P. 850–858.
Review
For citations:
Shkalova L.V., Mogeiko N.P., Iljinsky I.M., Moysyuk Y.G., Tsirulnikova O.M., Gautier S.V. THE DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER ALLOGRAFT ACUTE REJECTION IN LIVER BIOPSIES. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2011;13(3):15-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-3-15-19
Views:
973
Email this article 