PREEXISTING PATHOLOGY IN ZERO BIOPSIES DONOR KIDNEYS AND IN ONE-HOUR BIOPSIES OF KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-92-99
Abstract
In the following paper we present thedetailed analisys of data available in the literature concerning the «zero» byopsies of donor kidneys and «hour» byopsies of kidney allografts. With attention we take a look on a previous existed pathology of cadaver kidneys discovered through byopsies. We trying to define the role of preexisting pathology in the following results of transplantation. Moreover we describe the histologic criteria of suitability of cadaver kidneys for transplantation
About the Authors
M. L. Arefjev
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. G. Minina
Moscow coordinating centre оf organ donation, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificial organs of Sechenov Moscow Medical Academi, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. M. Iljinsky
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificial organs of Sechenov Moscow Medical Academi, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Нестеренко И.В. Аллотрансплантация трупных по- чек, полученных от маргинальных доноров // Авто- реф. дисс. ... докт. мед. наук. М. 2008. 46 с.
2. Andersen C.B., Ladefoged S.D., Larsen S. Acute kidney graft rejection. A morphological and immunohistological study on «zero-hour» and follow-up biopsies with spe- cial emphasis on cellular infiltrates and adhesion mole- cules // APMIS. 1994. Vol. 102. No 1. P. 23–37.
3. Anglicheau D., Loupy A., Lefaucheur C. et al. A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors // Am. J. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 8. No 11. P. 2181–2182.
4. Bosmans J.L., Woestenburg A.T., Helbert M.J. et al. Impact of donor-related vascular alterations in implan- tation biopsies on morphologic and functional outcome of cadaveric renal allografts // Transplant. Proc. 2000. Vol. 32. No 2. P. 379–380.
5. Bosmans J.L., Woestenburg A., Ysebaert D.K. Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation as a risk factor for the
6. outcome of cadaveric renal allografts // Transplantation.
7. Vol. 69. No 11. P. 2388–2394.
8. Carter J.T., Lee C.M., Weinstein R.J. et al. Evaluation
9. of the older cadaveric kidney donor: the impact of do- nor hypertension and creatinine clearance on graft per- formance and survival // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 70. No 5. P. 765–771.
10. Chapman J. Chronic allograft nephropathy. Longitudinal analysis of chronic allograft nephropathy: clinicopatho- logic correlations // Kidney Int. 2005. Vol. 68. P. S108– S112.
11. Emiroglu R., Yagmurdur M.C., Karakayali F. et al. Role of donor age and acute rejection episodes on long-term graft survival in cadaveric kidney transplantations // Transplant Proc. 2005. Vol. 37. No 7. P. 2954–2956.
12. Escofet X., Osman H., Griffiths D.F. et al. The presence of glomerular sclerosis at time zero has a significant im- pact on function after cadaveric renal transplantation // Transplantation. 2003. Vol. 75. No 3. P. 344–346.
13. Gaber L., Moore L., Alloway R. et al. Glomerulosclero- sis as a determinant of post transplant function of older donor renal allografts // Transplantation. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 334–339.
14. Gonzalez-Martinez F., Curi L., Orihuela S. et al. Cardio- vascular disease and/or elderly donors in renal transplan- tation: the outcome of grafts and patients // Transplant. Proc. 2004. Vol. 36. No 6. P. 1687–1688.
15. Gurney M., Neidlinger N., Djamali A. et al. Donor small vessel disease and interstitial fibrosis correlate with short term kidney allograft dysfunction // XXIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society. Vancouver. Au- gust 15–19, 2010. P43.18
16. HiesseC.,PessioneF.,CohenS.Kidneygraftsfromelder- ly donors // Presse Med. 2003. Vol. 32. No 20. P. 942–951.
17. Kaneku H.K., Terasaki P.I. Thirty year trend in kidney transplants: UCLA and UNOS Renal Transplant Regist-
18. ry // Clin. Transpl. 2006. No 1. P. 27.
19. Kasiske B.L., Andany M.A., Danielson B. A thirty per-
20. cent chronic decline in inverse serum creatinine is an ex- cellent predictor of late allograft failure // Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002. Vol. 39. P. 762–768.
21. Kasiske B.L., Snyder J. Matching older kidneys with ol- der patients does not improve allograft survival // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 13. P. 1067–1072.
22. Kayler L.K., Mohanka R., Basu A. et al. Correlation of histologic findings on preimplant biopsy with kidney graft survival // Transpl. Int. 2008. Vol. 21. No 9. P. 892– 898.
23. Kuypers D.R., Chapman J.R., O’Connell P.J. et al. Pre- dictors of renal transplant histology at three months // Transplantation. 1999. Vol. 67. P. 1222–1230.
24. Lehtonen S.R., Taskinen E.I., Isoniemi H.M. Histopatho- logical findings in renal allografts at time of transplanta- tion and correlation with onset of graft function // Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. (Scand). 1999. Vol. 107. P. 945–950.
25. Lehtonen S.R., Taskinen E.I., Isoniemi H.M. Histologi- cal alterations in implant and one-year protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 72. No 6. P. 1138–1144.
26. Li M., Nicholls K.M., Becker G.J. Glomerular size and global glomerulosclerosis in normal Caucasian donor kidneys: effects of aging and gender // J. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 15. No 6. P. 614–619.
27. Li M., Nicholls K.M., Becker G.J. Risk factors for late re- nal allograft dysfunction: effects of baseline glomerular size // J. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 15. No 6. P. 620–625.
28. Lu A.D., Desai D., Myers B.D. Severe glomerular sclerosis is not associated with poor outcome after kidney trans- plantation // Am. J. Surg. 2000. Vol. 180. No 6. P. 470–474.
29. Lu A.D., Desai D., Myers B.D. et al. Excellent outcome despite adverse histology after cadaveric renal transplan- tation // Transplant Proc. 2001. Vol. 33. No 1–2. P. 1148.
30. Martul E.V., Barreiro A.V. Importance of kidney biopsy in graft selection // Transplantation Proceedings. 2003. Vol. 35. No 5. P. 1658–1660.
31. McGlynn L.M., Stevenson K., Lamb K. et al. Cellular senescence in pretransplant renal biopsies predicts post- operative organ function // Aging. Cell. 2009. Vol. 8. No 1. P. 45–51.
32. Minakawa R., Tyden G., Lindholm B., Reinholt F.P. Donor kidney vasculopathy: impact on outcome in kidney trans- plantation // Transpl. Immunol. 1996. Vol. 4. P. 309–312.
33. Oda A., Morozumi K., Uchida K. Histological factors of 1-h biopsy influencing the delayed renal function and outcome in cadaveric renal allografts // Clin. Transplant. 1999. Vol. 13. Suppl. 1. P. 6–12.
34. Ojo A.O., Hanson J.A., Meier-Kriesche H. et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compa- red with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candi- dates // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2001. Vol. 12. P. 589–597.
35. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M. et al. Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal do- nors // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 36–43.
36. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Adverse effect of donor arteriolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 705–710.
37. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Morpho- logic changes in renal procurement biopsy and onset of graft function // Transplant. Proc. 2001. Vol. 33. No 1–2. P. 1999–2000.
38. Rana T.A.K., Fitzgerald E., Akoh J.A. Impact of Donor Age on Outcome of Kidney Transplantation from Cont- rolled Donation after Cardiac Death // XXIII Internatio- nal Congress of the Transplantation Society. Vancouver. August 15–19, 2010. MO16.06
39. Randhawa P.S. Role of donor kidney biopsies in re- nal transplantation // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 71. P. 1361–1365.
40. Randhawa P.S., Minervini M.I., Lombardero M. et al. Bi- opsy of marginal donor kidneys: correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 1352–1357.
41. Schlieper G., Ivens K., Voiculescu A., et al. Eurotrans- plant senior program «old for old»: Results from 10 pati- ents // Clin. Transplant. 2001. Vol. 15. P. 100–105.
42. Seron D., Moreso F., Ramуn J.M. et al. Protocol renal allograft biopsies and the design of clinical trials aimed to prevent or treat chronic allograft nephropathy // Trans- plantation. 2000. Vol. 69. No 9. P. 1849–1855.
43. Sund S., Reisaeter A.V., Fauchald P. et al. Living donor kidney transplants: a biopsy study 1 year after transplan- tation, compared with baseline changes and correlation to kidney function at 1 and 3 years // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1999. Vol. 14. No 10. P. 2445–2454.
44. Sung R.S., Christensen L.L., Leichtman A.B. et al. Deter- minants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion // Am. J. Trans- plant. 2008. Vol. 8. No 4. P. 783–792.
45. Szanya J., Szakaly P., Magyarlaki T. et al. Predictive morphological findings in «zero-hour» biopsies of re- nal allografts // Acta Chir. Hung. 1997. Vol. 36. No 1–4. P. 346–348.
46. Taub H.C., Greenstein S.M., Lerner S.E. et al. Reassess- ment of the value of post-vascularization biopsy perfor- med at renal transplantation: the effects of arteriosclero- sis // J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. No 3. P. 575–577.
47. Terasaki P.I., Gjertson D.W., Cecka J.M. et al. Signifi- cance of the donor age effect on kidney transplants // Clin. Transplant. 1997. Vol. 11. No 5. Pt. 1. P. 366–372.
48. Tichy T., Tichy M., Zadrazil J. et al. Histologic findings in protocol biopsies of transplanted kidneys // Cesk. Pa- tol. 2003. Vol. 39. No 1. P. 11–16.
49. Ugarte R., Kraus E., Montgomery R. et al. Excellent out- comes after transplantation of deceased donor kidneys with high terminal creatinine and mild pathologic lesi- ons // Transplantation. 2005. Vol. 80. P. 794–800.
50. Vazquez M.C., Schiavelli R.O., Sabbatiello R. et al. Intra- operative renal biopsy and its relation to renal function at the end of the first year posttransplantation // Transplant- Proc. 1996. Vol. 28. P. 372–373.
51. Verran D., Sheridan A., Barnwell A. Biopsy of potential cadaveric renal allografts at the time of retrieval // Neph- rology (Carlton). 2005. Vol. 10. No 4. P. 414–417.
52. Wazna E., Pazik J., Perkowska-Ptasinska A. et al. Ar- teriolar hyalinization in implantation kidney biopsies as a predictor of graft function // Transplant. Proc. 2009. Vol. 41. No 8. P. 2975–2977.
53. Wells A.C., Rushworth L., Thiru S. et al. Donor kidney disease and transplant outcome for kidneys donated after cardiac death // Br. J. Surg. 2009. Vol. 96. No 3. P. 299–304.
54. Woestenburg A., Sennesael J., Bosmans JL., Verbeelen D. Vasculopathy in the kidney allograft at time of trans- plantation: impact on later function of the graft // Trans- plantation. 2008. Vol. 85. No 7. P. S10–18.
55. Woestenburg A.T., Verpooten G.A., Ysebaert D.K. et al. Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation adversely af- fects long-term kidney allograft function // Transplanta- tion. 2009. Vol. 87. No 1. P. 72–78.
56. Yilmaz S., Tomlanovich S., Mathew T. et al. Protocol core needle biopsy and histologic chronic allograft damage index (CADI) as surrogate end point for long-term graft survival in multicenter studies // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003. Vol. 14. P. 773–779.
Review
For citations:
Arefjev M.L., Minina M.G., Iljinsky I.M. PREEXISTING PATHOLOGY IN ZERO BIOPSIES DONOR KIDNEYS AND IN ONE-HOUR BIOPSIES OF KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2011;13(1):92-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-92-99
Views:
677
Email this article 