ПРЕДСУЩЕСТВУЮЩАЯ ПАТОЛОГИЯ В НУЛЕВЫХ БИОПТАТАХ ДОНОРСКИХ ПОЧЕК И ОДНОЧАСОВЫХ БИОПТАТАХ АЛЛОТРАНСПЛАНТИРОВАННЫХ ПОЧЕК
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-92-99
Аннотация
В статье анализируются имеющиеся в современной литературе по трансплантологии данные о нулевых биопсиях донорских почек и одночасовых биопсиях аллотрансплантированных почек. Подробно рас- сматриваются вопросы предсуществующей патологии и ее роль в дальнейшей судьбе трансплантатов, приведены гистологические аспекты пригодности донорских почек к трансплантации.
Об авторах
М. Л. Арефьев
ФГУ «Федеральный научный центр трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития РФ, Москва
Россия
Россия
М. Г. Минина
Московский координационный центр органного донорства Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы
Кафедра трансплантологии и искусственных органов I МГМУ имени И.М. Сеченова, Москва
Россия
Россия
И. М. Ильинский
ФГУ «Федеральный научный центр трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития РФ, Москва
Кафедра трансплантологии и искусственных органов I МГМУ имени И.М. Сеченова, Москва
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Нестеренко И.В. Аллотрансплантация трупных по- чек, полученных от маргинальных доноров // Авто- реф. дисс. ... докт. мед. наук. М. 2008. 46 с.
2. Andersen C.B., Ladefoged S.D., Larsen S. Acute kidney graft rejection. A morphological and immunohistological study on «zero-hour» and follow-up biopsies with spe- cial emphasis on cellular infiltrates and adhesion mole- cules // APMIS. 1994. Vol. 102. No 1. P. 23–37.
3. Anglicheau D., Loupy A., Lefaucheur C. et al. A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors // Am. J. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 8. No 11. P. 2181–2182.
4. Bosmans J.L., Woestenburg A.T., Helbert M.J. et al. Impact of donor-related vascular alterations in implan- tation biopsies on morphologic and functional outcome of cadaveric renal allografts // Transplant. Proc. 2000. Vol. 32. No 2. P. 379–380.
5. Bosmans J.L., Woestenburg A., Ysebaert D.K. Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation as a risk factor for the
6. outcome of cadaveric renal allografts // Transplantation.
7. Vol. 69. No 11. P. 2388–2394.
8. Carter J.T., Lee C.M., Weinstein R.J. et al. Evaluation
9. of the older cadaveric kidney donor: the impact of do- nor hypertension and creatinine clearance on graft per- formance and survival // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 70. No 5. P. 765–771.
10. Chapman J. Chronic allograft nephropathy. Longitudinal analysis of chronic allograft nephropathy: clinicopatho- logic correlations // Kidney Int. 2005. Vol. 68. P. S108– S112.
11. Emiroglu R., Yagmurdur M.C., Karakayali F. et al. Role of donor age and acute rejection episodes on long-term graft survival in cadaveric kidney transplantations // Transplant Proc. 2005. Vol. 37. No 7. P. 2954–2956.
12. Escofet X., Osman H., Griffiths D.F. et al. The presence of glomerular sclerosis at time zero has a significant im- pact on function after cadaveric renal transplantation // Transplantation. 2003. Vol. 75. No 3. P. 344–346.
13. Gaber L., Moore L., Alloway R. et al. Glomerulosclero- sis as a determinant of post transplant function of older donor renal allografts // Transplantation. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 334–339.
14. Gonzalez-Martinez F., Curi L., Orihuela S. et al. Cardio- vascular disease and/or elderly donors in renal transplan- tation: the outcome of grafts and patients // Transplant. Proc. 2004. Vol. 36. No 6. P. 1687–1688.
15. Gurney M., Neidlinger N., Djamali A. et al. Donor small vessel disease and interstitial fibrosis correlate with short term kidney allograft dysfunction // XXIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society. Vancouver. Au- gust 15–19, 2010. P43.18
16. HiesseC.,PessioneF.,CohenS.Kidneygraftsfromelder- ly donors // Presse Med. 2003. Vol. 32. No 20. P. 942–951.
17. Kaneku H.K., Terasaki P.I. Thirty year trend in kidney transplants: UCLA and UNOS Renal Transplant Regist-
18. ry // Clin. Transpl. 2006. No 1. P. 27.
19. Kasiske B.L., Andany M.A., Danielson B. A thirty per-
20. cent chronic decline in inverse serum creatinine is an ex- cellent predictor of late allograft failure // Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002. Vol. 39. P. 762–768.
21. Kasiske B.L., Snyder J. Matching older kidneys with ol- der patients does not improve allograft survival // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 13. P. 1067–1072.
22. Kayler L.K., Mohanka R., Basu A. et al. Correlation of histologic findings on preimplant biopsy with kidney graft survival // Transpl. Int. 2008. Vol. 21. No 9. P. 892– 898.
23. Kuypers D.R., Chapman J.R., O’Connell P.J. et al. Pre- dictors of renal transplant histology at three months // Transplantation. 1999. Vol. 67. P. 1222–1230.
24. Lehtonen S.R., Taskinen E.I., Isoniemi H.M. Histopatho- logical findings in renal allografts at time of transplanta- tion and correlation with onset of graft function // Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. (Scand). 1999. Vol. 107. P. 945–950.
25. Lehtonen S.R., Taskinen E.I., Isoniemi H.M. Histologi- cal alterations in implant and one-year protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 72. No 6. P. 1138–1144.
26. Li M., Nicholls K.M., Becker G.J. Glomerular size and global glomerulosclerosis in normal Caucasian donor kidneys: effects of aging and gender // J. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 15. No 6. P. 614–619.
27. Li M., Nicholls K.M., Becker G.J. Risk factors for late re- nal allograft dysfunction: effects of baseline glomerular size // J. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 15. No 6. P. 620–625.
28. Lu A.D., Desai D., Myers B.D. Severe glomerular sclerosis is not associated with poor outcome after kidney trans- plantation // Am. J. Surg. 2000. Vol. 180. No 6. P. 470–474.
29. Lu A.D., Desai D., Myers B.D. et al. Excellent outcome despite adverse histology after cadaveric renal transplan- tation // Transplant Proc. 2001. Vol. 33. No 1–2. P. 1148.
30. Martul E.V., Barreiro A.V. Importance of kidney biopsy in graft selection // Transplantation Proceedings. 2003. Vol. 35. No 5. P. 1658–1660.
31. McGlynn L.M., Stevenson K., Lamb K. et al. Cellular senescence in pretransplant renal biopsies predicts post- operative organ function // Aging. Cell. 2009. Vol. 8. No 1. P. 45–51.
32. Minakawa R., Tyden G., Lindholm B., Reinholt F.P. Donor kidney vasculopathy: impact on outcome in kidney trans- plantation // Transpl. Immunol. 1996. Vol. 4. P. 309–312.
33. Oda A., Morozumi K., Uchida K. Histological factors of 1-h biopsy influencing the delayed renal function and outcome in cadaveric renal allografts // Clin. Transplant. 1999. Vol. 13. Suppl. 1. P. 6–12.
34. Ojo A.O., Hanson J.A., Meier-Kriesche H. et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compa- red with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candi- dates // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2001. Vol. 12. P. 589–597.
35. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M. et al. Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal do- nors // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 36–43.
36. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Adverse effect of donor arteriolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 705–710.
37. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Morpho- logic changes in renal procurement biopsy and onset of graft function // Transplant. Proc. 2001. Vol. 33. No 1–2. P. 1999–2000.
38. Rana T.A.K., Fitzgerald E., Akoh J.A. Impact of Donor Age on Outcome of Kidney Transplantation from Cont- rolled Donation after Cardiac Death // XXIII Internatio- nal Congress of the Transplantation Society. Vancouver. August 15–19, 2010. MO16.06
39. Randhawa P.S. Role of donor kidney biopsies in re- nal transplantation // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 71. P. 1361–1365.
40. Randhawa P.S., Minervini M.I., Lombardero M. et al. Bi- opsy of marginal donor kidneys: correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 1352–1357.
41. Schlieper G., Ivens K., Voiculescu A., et al. Eurotrans- plant senior program «old for old»: Results from 10 pati- ents // Clin. Transplant. 2001. Vol. 15. P. 100–105.
42. Seron D., Moreso F., Ramуn J.M. et al. Protocol renal allograft biopsies and the design of clinical trials aimed to prevent or treat chronic allograft nephropathy // Trans- plantation. 2000. Vol. 69. No 9. P. 1849–1855.
43. Sund S., Reisaeter A.V., Fauchald P. et al. Living donor kidney transplants: a biopsy study 1 year after transplan- tation, compared with baseline changes and correlation to kidney function at 1 and 3 years // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1999. Vol. 14. No 10. P. 2445–2454.
44. Sung R.S., Christensen L.L., Leichtman A.B. et al. Deter- minants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion // Am. J. Trans- plant. 2008. Vol. 8. No 4. P. 783–792.
45. Szanya J., Szakaly P., Magyarlaki T. et al. Predictive morphological findings in «zero-hour» biopsies of re- nal allografts // Acta Chir. Hung. 1997. Vol. 36. No 1–4. P. 346–348.
46. Taub H.C., Greenstein S.M., Lerner S.E. et al. Reassess- ment of the value of post-vascularization biopsy perfor- med at renal transplantation: the effects of arteriosclero- sis // J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. No 3. P. 575–577.
47. Terasaki P.I., Gjertson D.W., Cecka J.M. et al. Signifi- cance of the donor age effect on kidney transplants // Clin. Transplant. 1997. Vol. 11. No 5. Pt. 1. P. 366–372.
48. Tichy T., Tichy M., Zadrazil J. et al. Histologic findings in protocol biopsies of transplanted kidneys // Cesk. Pa- tol. 2003. Vol. 39. No 1. P. 11–16.
49. Ugarte R., Kraus E., Montgomery R. et al. Excellent out- comes after transplantation of deceased donor kidneys with high terminal creatinine and mild pathologic lesi- ons // Transplantation. 2005. Vol. 80. P. 794–800.
50. Vazquez M.C., Schiavelli R.O., Sabbatiello R. et al. Intra- operative renal biopsy and its relation to renal function at the end of the first year posttransplantation // Transplant- Proc. 1996. Vol. 28. P. 372–373.
51. Verran D., Sheridan A., Barnwell A. Biopsy of potential cadaveric renal allografts at the time of retrieval // Neph- rology (Carlton). 2005. Vol. 10. No 4. P. 414–417.
52. Wazna E., Pazik J., Perkowska-Ptasinska A. et al. Ar- teriolar hyalinization in implantation kidney biopsies as a predictor of graft function // Transplant. Proc. 2009. Vol. 41. No 8. P. 2975–2977.
53. Wells A.C., Rushworth L., Thiru S. et al. Donor kidney disease and transplant outcome for kidneys donated after cardiac death // Br. J. Surg. 2009. Vol. 96. No 3. P. 299–304.
54. Woestenburg A., Sennesael J., Bosmans JL., Verbeelen D. Vasculopathy in the kidney allograft at time of trans- plantation: impact on later function of the graft // Trans- plantation. 2008. Vol. 85. No 7. P. S10–18.
55. Woestenburg A.T., Verpooten G.A., Ysebaert D.K. et al. Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation adversely af- fects long-term kidney allograft function // Transplanta- tion. 2009. Vol. 87. No 1. P. 72–78.
56. Yilmaz S., Tomlanovich S., Mathew T. et al. Protocol core needle biopsy and histologic chronic allograft damage index (CADI) as surrogate end point for long-term graft survival in multicenter studies // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003. Vol. 14. P. 773–779.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Арефьев М.Л., Минина М.Г., Ильинский И.М. ПРЕДСУЩЕСТВУЮЩАЯ ПАТОЛОГИЯ В НУЛЕВЫХ БИОПТАТАХ ДОНОРСКИХ ПОЧЕК И ОДНОЧАСОВЫХ БИОПТАТАХ АЛЛОТРАНСПЛАНТИРОВАННЫХ ПОЧЕК. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2011;13(1):92-99. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-92-99
For citation:
Arefjev M.L., Minina M.G., Iljinsky I.M. PREEXISTING PATHOLOGY IN ZERO BIOPSIES DONOR KIDNEYS AND IN ONE-HOUR BIOPSIES OF KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2011;13(1):92-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-92-99
Просмотров:
674
Послать статью по эл. почте 