PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF ZERO BIOPSIES OF DONOR KIDNEYS
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-36-42
Abstract
There is well known fact that kidney transplants from Extended Criteria Donors may increase risk of De- layed Graft Function and Primary Non-Function of transplants. We have collected and tested 65 «zero» kidney biopsies from cadaver donors aged from 19 to 71 years old. In the pool of elderly donors who died from cerebrovascular accident the frequency of nephrosclerosis presentation was higher than in donors of yonger age who died from craniocephalic trauma. Nevertheless in the general donor pool the number of sclerosed glomeruli was no more than 12%. We did not meet at all in the whole volume of material any bi- opsy with the severe degree of arteriosclerosis. The «zero» biopsies of cadaver kidneys is quite usable and unexpensive tool to measure the degree of nephrosclerosis in order to exclude kidneys which are not fitable for transplantation.
About the Authors
M. L. Arefjev
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. G. Minina
Moscow coordinating centre of organ donation, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. P. Mogeiko
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. M. Iljinsky
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Dept of Transplantology and artificials organs of Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Emiroglu R., Yagmurdur M.C., Karakayali F. et al. Role of donor age and acute rejection episodes on long-term graft survival in cadaveric kidney transplantations // Transplant Proc. – 2005. Vol. 37. No 7. P. 2954–2956.
2. Eschwege P., Droupy S., Conti M. et al. Value of li- pid peroxidation by-products detected during the renal procurement on renal graft function // Transplant Proc. 2002. Vol. 34. P. 2840.
3. Gaber L., Moore L., Alloway R. et al. Glomerulosclero- sis as a determinant of post transplant function of older donor renal allografts // Transplantation. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 334–339.
4. Gonzalez-Martinez F., Curi L., Orihuela S. et al. Cardi- ovascular disease and/or elderly donors in renal trans- plantation: the outcome of grafts and patients // Trans- plant. Proc. 2004. Vol. 36. No 6. P. 1687–1688.
5. Lehtonen S.R., Taskinen E.I., Isoniemi H.M. Histologi- cal alterations in implant and one-year protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 72. No 6. P. 1138–1144.
6. Martul E.V., Barreiro A.V. Importance of kidney biopsy in graft selection // Transplantation Proceedings. 2003. Vol. 35. No 5. P. 1658–1660.
7. McCall S.J., Tuttle-Newhall J.E., Howell D.N., Fields T.A. Prognostic significance of microvascular thrombosis in donor kidney allograft biopsies // Transplantation. 2003. Vol. 75. No 11. P. 1847–1852.
8. Mikhalski D., Wissing K.M., Ghisdal L. et al. Cold ische- mia is a major determinant of acute rejection and renal graft survival in the modern era of immunosuppressi- on // Transplantation. 2008. Vol. 85. No 7. P. S3–9.
9. Oda A., Morozumi K., Uchida K. Histological factors of 1-h biopsy influencing the delayed renal function and outcome in cadaveric renal allografts // Clin. Transplant. 1999. Vol. 13. Suppl. 1. P. 6–12.
10. Papadimitriou J.C., Coale R., Farney A. et al. Biopsy of the marginal kidney donor: correlation of histology with outcome // Transplantation Proceedings. 2004. Vol. 36. P. 742–744.
11. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M. et al. Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal do- nors // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 36–43.
12. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Adverse effect of donor arteriolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 705–710.
13. Pokorna E., Vitko S., Chadimova M., Schuck O. Mor- phologic changes in renal procurement biopsy and on- set of graft function // Transplant. Proc. 2001. Vol. 33. No 1–2. P.1999–2000.
14. Randhawa P.S., Minervini M.I., Lombardero M. et al. Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: correlation of histo- logic findings with graft dysfunction // Transplantation. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 1352–1357.
15. Salahudeen A.K., Joshi M., Jenkins J.K. Apoptosis versus necrosis during cold storage and rewarming of human renal proximal tubular cells // Transplantation. 2001. Vol. 72. No 5. P. 798–804.
16. Salahudeen A.K., May W. Reduction in cold ischemia time of renal allografts in the United States over the last decade // Transplant. Proc. 2008. Vol. 40. No 5. P. 1285– 1289.
17. Woestenburg A., Sennesael J., Bosmans JL., Verbeelen D. Vasculopathy in the kidney allograft at time of trans- plantation: impact on later function of the graft // Trans- plantation. 2008. V. 85. No 7. P. S10–18.
Review
For citations:
Arefjev M.L., Minina M.G., Mogeiko N.P., Iljinsky I.M. PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF ZERO BIOPSIES OF DONOR KIDNEYS. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2011;13(1):36-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2011-1-36-42
Views:
863
Email this article 