EXPERIENCE WITH IN ON-X PROSTHESIS IN HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2010-4-39-43
Abstract
The prosthesis ON-X carcas has advantages in implantation commodity and safety, effective orifice area. We pe- sent results of this prosthesis usage during perioud of 2006–2009 years. This time 792 operations with AC were completed. In mitral position were implanted 132 (91,7%) prostheses ON-X. Of them 80 (60,6%) valves were sutured with complete or partial preservation of posterior leaflet and 26 (19,7%) valves – with total MV preser- vation. In aortic position we implanted 76 (53,9%) valves ON-X. Only 3 cases needed posterior aortoplasty for the N 23 prosthesis implantation.
In perioperative and late postoperative periods we didn’t meet prostheses thrombosis or dysfunction. Reoperati- ons for high prosthesis gradients didn’t occur in postoperative period. Late postoperatively there were 3 (1,1%) cases of embolic events related to the incorrect anticoagulant treatment.
About the Authors
M. A. Sazonenkov
Regional clinical Hospital, Belgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Basarab
Regional clinical Hospital, Belgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. S. Krivorot
Regional clinical Hospital, Belgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. N. Korneluk
Regional clinical Hospital, Belgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Akins C.W. Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses // Ann Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 1836– 1844.
2. Birnbaum D., Laczovics A., Heidt M., Oelert H. et al. Examination of haemolytic potential with the On-X prosthetic heart valve // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2000. Vol. 9. P. 142–145.
3. Burkhardt D., Hoffmann A., Vogt S. et al. Clinical evalu- ation of the St Jude mechanical prostheses: a two-year follow-up of 150 patients // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1984. Vol. 88. P. 432–438.
4. Casarotto C. Guglielmi, Toscano G., Pistorio V. et al. Reoperations for acute prosthetic thrombosis and pan- nus: an assessment of rates, relationship and risk // Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg. 1999. Vol. 16. P. 74–80.
5. Chambers J., Oo L., Narracott A., Lawford P. et al. Nominal size in six bileaflet mechanical aortic valves: A comparison of orifice size and biologic equiva- lence // Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 125. P. 1388–1393.
6. Chambers J., Roxburgh J., Blauth C., O’Riordan J. et al. A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and Car- boMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aor- tic valves: Early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 130. P. 759–764.
7. Fiore A., Barner H., Swartz M. et al. Mitral valve replace- ment. Randomized trial of the St. Jude and Medtronic Hall Prostheses // Ann Thorac. Surg. 1998. Vol. 66. P. 707–713.
8. Horstkotte D., Burckhardt D. Prosthetic valve thrombo- sis // J. Heart Valve Dis. 1995. Vol. 4. P. 141–153.
9. Hwang N., Reul H., Reinhard P. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve // J. Heart Valve Dis. 1998. Vol. 7. P. 561–568.
10. Jamieson W., Miyagishima R., Grunkemeier G., Ger- mann E. et al. Bileaflet mechanical prostheses performance in mitral position // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1999. Vol. 15. P. 786–794.
11. Laczkovics A., Heidt M., Oelert H., Laufer G. et al. Early experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve //
12. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2001. Vol. 10. P. 94–99.
13. Ma L., Sines G.H. Unalloyed pyrolytic carbon for im- planted mechanical heart valves // J. Heart Valve Dis.
14. Vol. 8. P. 578–585.
15. Ma L., Sines G. Fatigue behavior of a pyrolytic carbon // J. Biomed Mater Res. 2000. Vol. 51. P. 61–68.
16. Moidl R., Simon P. Wolner E and members of the On-X prosthesis heart valve trial. The On-X Prosthetic Heart Valve at Five Years // Ann Thorac. Surg. 2002. Vol. 74. S. 1312–1317.
17. Palatianos G., Laczkovics A., Simon P., Pomar J. et al. Multicentered european study on safety and effective- ness of the On-X prosthetic heart valve: intermediate follow-up // Ann Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83. P. 40–46.
18. Saour J., Sieck J., Mamo L., Gallus A. Trial of different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves // Engl. J. Med. 1990. Vol. 322. P. 428–432.
19. Walther T., Falk V., Tigges R., Kruger M. et al. Com- parison of On-X and SJM HP bileaflet aortic valves // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2000. Vol. 9. P. 403–407.
20. Wang Z., Grainger N., Chambers J. Doppler echocar- diography in normally functioning replacement heart valves: a literature review // J. Heart Valve Dis. 1995. Vol. 4. P. 591–614.
Review
For citations:
Sazonenkov M.A., Basarab D.A., Krivorot S.S., Korneluk M.N. EXPERIENCE WITH IN ON-X PROSTHESIS IN HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2010;12(4):39-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2010-4-39-43
Views:
889
Email this article 