CARDIAC VALVE PROSTHESIS «MEDENG-2»: 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF CLINICAL APPLICATION Vavilov P.A.
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2010-3-29-35
Abstract
In our department from December 1998 to 2009 have been performed 1028 operations with use of prosthesises «MedEng-2»: aortic valve replacement (AVR) – 494, mitral valve replacement (MVR) – 351 and double valves mitral and aortic replacement (DVR) – 183.
Remote results are tracked at 76% (719) patients. The 10-years survival rate has made 4532 patient-years of them 3146 pats.-years (86,4%) for AVR, 2530 (82,4%) for MVR and 836 (82,9%) for DVR. Mechanical dysfunctions of artificial valves were not. Freedom from a thrombosis, endocarditis and reoperations at AVR has made 98,7; 97,6; 97,1% accordingly. From embolism complications – 97,5%. For MVR freedom from thrombosis – 96,9%, endocarditis – 97,7%, from reoperations and embolism complications of 99,1 and 91,2%. Freedom from throm- bosis and endocarditis at DVR 100 and 97,4% accordingly. From embolism complications and reoperations – 97,5%.
The analysis of 10-years results of replacements prosthetics valves «MedEng-2» has shown its good haemody- namic qualities and satisfactory results both in the nearest, and in the remote terms after operation.
About the Author
P. A. Vavilov
Academician V.I. Shumakov Federal Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Шумаков В.И., Вавилов П.А., Семеновский М.Л. и др.
2. -летний опыт операций при митрально-аортальных пороках сердца // Материалы 11-го Всероссийско- го съезда сердечно-сосудистых хирургов: Бюлле- тень НЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН «Сердечно- сосудистые заболевания». 2005. Том 6. No 5. С. 45.
3. Шумаков В.И., Семеновский М.Л., Вавилов П.А. и др. Результаты протезирования митрального и/или аортального клапанов сердца двустворчатыми про- тезами // Материалы 9-го Всероссийского съезда сердечно-сосудистых хирургов: Бюллетень НЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева «Сердечно-сосудистые заболева- ния». 2003. Том 4. No 11. С. 41.
4. Семеновский М.Л., Вавилов П.А., Белова А.Э. и др.
5. Протезирование аортального клапана супраанну- лярными протезами «МедИнж-2» при узкой аорте // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2006. No 2. С. 18–21.
6. Назаров В.М., Железнев С.И., Богачев-Прокофь- ев А.В. и др. Многоцентровое клиническое иссле- дование протезов клапанов сердца «МедИнж-2» // Материалы 14-го Всероссийского съезда сердечно- сосудистых хирургов. Бюллетень НЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева «Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания». 2008. Том 9. No 6. С. 32.
7. Akins C.W. Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses // Ann Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 1836– 1844.
8. Arom K.V., Nicoloff D.M., Kersten T.E. et al. Ten-years follow-up of patients who had double replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1989. Vol. 98. P. 1008–1016.
9. Birkmeyer N.J.O., Birkmeyer J.D., Tosteson A.N.A. et al. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergouing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000. Vol. 70. P. 1946–1952.
10. Bortolotti U., Milano A., Thiene G. et al. Long-term durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis follow- ing combined mitral and aortic valve replacement: an 11-year experience // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1987. Vol. 44. P. 139–144.
11. Chocron S., Etievent J.P., Viel J.F. et al. Prospektive study of life before and after open heart operation // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996. Vol. 61 (1). P. 153–157.
12. Debetaz L.-F., Ruchat P., Hurni M. et al. St. Jude Medi- cal valve prosthesis: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1997. P. 113–148.
13. Dumesnil J.G., Yoganathan A.P. Valve prosthesis hemo- dynamics and the problem of higt transprosthetic pres- sure gradients // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1992. Vol. 6 (Suppl. 1). P. 534–537.
14. Fiane A.E., Geiran O.R. and Svenneving J.L. Up to eight years follow-up of 997 patients receiving the CarboMed- ics prosthetic heart valve // Ann. Thorac. Surg. August 1. 1998. Vol. 66 (2). P. 443–448.
15. Fiore A.C., Swartz M.T., Sharp T.G. et al. Double-valve replacement with Medtronic-Hall or St. Jude valve // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 59 (5). P. 1113–1118.
16. Gillinov A.M., Diaz R., Blackstone E. et al. Double valve endocardinis // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71. P. 1874–1879.
17. Gueret P., Vignon P., Fournier P. et al. Transesophageal echocardiography for the diagnosis and managenent of nonobstructive thrombosis of mechanical mitral valve prosthesis // Circulation. 1995. Vol. 91 (1). P. 103–110.
18. Henneke K.H., Pongratz G., Bachmann K. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of pros- thetic valve hemodynamics // J. Hear. Valve. Dis. 1995. Vol. 4 (1). P. 18–25.
19. John S., Ravicumar E., John C.N., Bashi V.V. 25-year Experience with 456 combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000. Vol. 69. P. 1167–1172.
20. Manouquian S., Kirchoff P.G. Patch enlargement of aor- tic and mitral valve ring with aortic-mitral double-valve replacement // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Vol. 30. P. 369–399.
21. Renzulli A., Ismeno G., Bellitti R. et al. Long-term results of heart valve replacement with bileaflet prosthesis // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 1997. Vol. 38 (3). P. 241– 247.
22. Salem D.B., Stein P., Al-Ahmad A. et al. Antithrobotic therapy in valvular heart disease-native and prosthetic // Chest. 2004. Vol. 126. P. 457S–482S.
23. Straber M., Campbell A., Richard G., Laas J. Hydro- dynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement // Eur. J. Cardiovas- cular. Surg. 1996. Vol. 10 (6). P. 422–427.
24. Thourani V.H., Weintraub W.S., Craver J.M. et al. Ten- year trends in heart valve replacement operations // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000. Vol. 70. P. 448–455.
Review
For citations:
Vavilov P.A. CARDIAC VALVE PROSTHESIS «MEDENG-2»: 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF CLINICAL APPLICATION Vavilov P.A. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2010;12(3):29-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2010-3-29-35
Views:
1752
Email this article 