Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

Decellularized porcine liver scaffold for maintaining the viability and capacity of pancreatic islets

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-1-90-102

Abstract

Bioengineered pancreatic constructs based on scaffolds made from decellularized tissues and pancreatic islets (PIs) may be used to extend the functional activity of transplanted PIs in patients with type I diabetes. Objective: to investigate in vitro the effect of decellularized porcine liver scaffold (DPLS) on the viability and insulin-producing capacity of isolated human PIs. Materials and methods. The resulting DPLS was subjected to histological examination, DNA quantification, and cytotoxic effect testing. The PIs were isolated from human pancreas fragments using the collagenase technique. Under standard conditions, PIs were cultured in three different environments: monoculture (control group), with DPLS present (experimental group 1) or with decellularized human pancreas scaffold (DHPS) present (experimental group 2). Vital fluorescent dyes were used to evaluate the viability of PIs. Basal and glucose-loaded insulin concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay. Results. The basic composition and structure of the extracellular matrix of liver tissue in DPLS samples were preserved thanks to the selected decellularization procedure. The samples had no cytotoxic effect, and the residual amount of DNA in the scaffold did not exceed 1.0%. PIs from the experimental groups showed no significant signs of degradation and fragmentation during the 10-day incubation period compared to PIs from the control group. On day 10, the viability of PIs from experimental group 1 was 64%, that of experimental group 2 was 72%, and that of the control group was less than 20%. After the first day of culturing, insulin concentration were 29.0% higher in experimental group 1 and 39.1% higher in experimental group 2 compared to the control group. On day 10 of the experiment, insulin levels in experimental groups 1 and 2 differed by 124.8% and 150.9%, respectively, from the control group. Under a glucose load, the insulin level in experimental group 1 was 1.7 times higher than in the control group, whereas that of experimental group 2 was 2.2 times higher. Conclusion. The resulting DPLS has a positive effect on the viability and insulin-producing capacity of PIs. When creating a bioengineered construct of PIs, DPLS can be used as a component obtained in sufficient quantity from an available source.

About the Authors

N. V. Baranova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow 



A. S. Ponomareva
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Anna Ponomareva

1, Shchukinskaya str., Moscow, 123182 Phone: (499) 196-26-61; (926) 585-23-73



A. D. Belova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow 



L. A. Kirsanova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow 



D. D. Filin
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs ; Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
Russian Federation

Moscow 



E. A. Nemets
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow 



Yu. B. Basok
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow 



V. I. Sevastianov
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs ; Institute of Biomedical Research and Technology
Russian Federation

Moscow 



References

1. Ludwig B, Ludwig S, Steffen A, Saeger HD, Bornstein SR. Islet versus pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes: Competitive or complementary? Curr Diab Rep. 2010; 10 (6): 506–511. doi: 10.1007/s11892-010-0146-y. PMID: 20830612.

2. Abadpour S, Wang C, Niemi EM, Scholz H. Tissue Engineering Strategies for Improving Beta Cell Transplantation Outcome. Curr Transpl Rep. 2021; 8 (3): 205–219. doi: 10.1007/s40472-021-00333-2.

3. Abualhassan N, Sapozhnikov L, Pawlick RL, Kahana M, Pepper AR, Bruni A et al. Lung-Derived Microscaffolds Facilitate Diabetes Reversal after Mouse and Human Intraperitoneal Islet Transplantation. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (5): e0156053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156053. PMID: 27227978; PMCID: PMC4881949.

4. Damodaran GR, Vermette P. Decellularized pancreas as a native extracellular matrix scaffold for pancreatic islet seeding and culture. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018; 12 (5): 1230–1237. doi: 10.1002/term.2655. PMID: 29499099.

5. Napierala H, Hillebrandt KH, Haep N, Tang P, Tintemann M, Gassner J et al. Engineering an endocrine NeoPancreas by repopulation of a decellularized rat pancreas with islets of Langerhans. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41777. doi: 10.1038/srep41777. PMID: 28150744; PMCID: PMC5288794.

6. Orlando G, Farney AC, Iskandar SS, Mirmalek-Sani SH, Sullivan DC, Moran E et al. Production and implantation of renal extracellular matrix scaffolds from porcine kidneys as a platform for renal bioengineering investigations. Annals of Surgery. 2012; 256 (2): 363–370. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a02ab. PMID: 22691371.

7. Song JJ, Ott HC. Organ engineering based on decellularized matrix scaffolds. Trends Mol Med. 2011; 17 (8): 424–432. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.03.005. PMID: 21514224.

8. Mirmalek-Sani SH, Orlando G, McQuilling JP, Pareta R, Mack DL, Salvatori M et al. Porcine pancreas extracel lular matrix as a platform for endocrine pancreas bioengineering. Biomaterials. 2013; 34 (22): 5488–5495. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.054. PMID: 23583038; PMCID: PMC3680884.

9. Biomimetics of Extracellular Matrices for Cell and Tissue Engineered Medical Products / Ed. V.I. Sevastianov, Yu.B. Basok. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2023; 339.

10. Lim LY, Ding SSL, Muthukumaran P, Teoh SH, Koh Y, Teo AKK. Tissue engineering of decellularized pancreas scaffolds for regenerative medicine in diabetes. Acta biomater. 2023; 157: 49–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.032. PMID: 36427686.

11. Wu D, Wan J, Huang Y, Guo Y, Xu T, Zhu M et al. 3d Culture of MIN-6 Cells on Decellularized Pancreatic Scaffold: in vitro and in vivo Study. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 432645. doi: 10.1155/2015/432645. PMID: 26688810; PMCID: PMC4672115.

12. Shapiro AM. Strategies toward single-donor islets of Langerhans transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011; 16 (6): 627–631. doi: 10.1097 MOT.0b013e32834cfb84. PMID: 22068022; PMCID: PMC3268080.

13. Pepper AR, Gala-Lopez B, Ziff O, Shapiro AJ. Current status of clinical islet transplantation. World J Transplant. 2013; 3 (4): 48–53. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.48. PMID: 24392308; PMCID: PMC3879523.

14. Yang W, Xia R, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Bai L. Decellularized liver scaffold for liver regeneration. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1577: 11–23. doi: 10.1007/7651_2017_53. PMID: 28856614.

15. Rossi EA, Quintanilha LF, Nonaka CKV, Souza BSF. Advances in hepatic tissue bioengineering with decellularized liver bioscaffold. Stem Cells Int. 2019; 2019: 2693189. doi: 10.1155/2019/2693189. PMID: 31198426; PMCID: PMC6526559.

16. Zhou P, Guo Y, Huang Y, Zhu M, Fan X, Wang L et al. The dynamic three-dimensional culture of islet-like clusters in decellularized liver scaffolds. Cell Tissue Res. 2016; 365 (1): 157–171. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2356-8. PMID: 26796204.

17. Xu T, Zhu M, Guo Y, Wu D, Huang Y, Fan X et al. Three-dimensional culture of mouse pancreatic islet on a liver-derived perfusion-decellularized bioscaffold for potential clinical application. J Biomater Appl. 2015; 30 (4): 379–387. doi: 10.1177/0885328215587610. PMID: 26006767.

18. Goh SK, Bertera S, Richardson T, Banerjee I. Repopulation of decellularized organ scaffolds with human pluripotent stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitor cells. Biomed Mater. 2023; 18 (2). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/acb7bf. PMID: 36720168.

19. KhorsandiL,OrazizadehM,BijanNejadD,HeidariMoghadam A, Nejaddehbashi F, Asadi Fard Y. Spleen extracellular matrix provides a supportive microenvironment for β-cell function. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2022; 25 (9): 1159–1165. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2022.65233.14360. PMID: 36246063; PMCID: PMC9526894.

20. Goldman O, Puchinsky D, Durlacher K, Sancho R, Ludwig B, Kugelmeier P et al. Lung Based Engineered Micro-Pancreas Sustains Human Beta Cell Survival and Functionality. Horm Metab Res. 2019; 51 (12): 805–811. doi: 10.1055/a-1041-3305. PMID: 31826275.

21. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011; 32 (12): 3233–3243. doi: 10.1016/j. biomaterials.2011.01.057. PMID: 21296410; PMCID: PMC3084613.

22. Sevastianov VI, Ponomareva AS, Baranova NV, Kirsanova LA, Basok YuB, Nemets EA et al. Decellularization of Human Pancreatic Fragments with Pronounced Signs of Structural Changes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 24 (1): 119. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010119.28. PMID: 36613557; PMCID: PMC9820198.

23. Kirillova AD, Basok YuB, Lazhko AE, Grigoryev AM, Kirsanova LA, Nemets EA, Sevastianov VI. Creating a tissue-specific microdispersed matrix from a decellularized porcine liver. Physics and Chemistry of Materials Processing. 2020; 4: 41–50.

24. GOST ISO 10993-5-2011. Medical devices. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5. Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. M.: Standartinform, 2014; 9.

25. Daoud J, Heileman K, Shapka S, Rosenberg L, Tabrizian M. Dielectric spectroscopy for monitoring human pancreatic islet differentiation within cell-seeded scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor system. Analyst. 2015; 140 (18): 6295–6305. doi: 10.1039/c5an00525f. PMID: 26280028.

26. Sevastianov VI, Basok YuB, Gri­ goriev AM, Kirsanova LA, Vasilets VN. Application of tissue engineering technology for formation of human articular cartilage in perfusion bioreactor. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2017; 19 (3): 81–92. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2017-3-81-92.

27. Watanabe T, Sassi S, Ulziibayar A, Hama R, Kitsuka T, Shinoka T. The Application of Porous Scaffolds for Cardiovascular Tissues. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10 (2): 236. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020236. PMID: 36829730; PMCID: PMC9952004.

28. Flores-Jiménez MS, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Fuentes-Aguilar RQ. Review on Porous Scaffolds Generation Process: A Tissue Engineering Approach. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2023; 6 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.2c00740. PMID: 36599046.

29. Sevastianov VI, Grigoriev AM, Basok YuB, Kirsanova LA, Vasilets VN, Malkova AP et al. Biocompatible and matrix properties of polylactide scaffolds. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2018; 20 (2): 82–90. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2018-2-82-90.

30. Carriero VC, Di Muzio L, Petralito S, Casadei MA, Paolicelli P. Cryogel Scaffolds for Tissue-Engineering: Advances and Challenges for Effective Bone and Cartilage Regeneration. Gels. 2023; 9 (12): 979. doi: 10.3390/gels9120979. PMID: 38131965; PMCID: PMC10742915.

31. Ioch K, Lozinsky VI, Galaev IY, Yavriyanz K, Vorobeychik M, Azarov D et al. Functional activity of insulinoma cells (INS-1E) and pancreaTEC islets cultured in agarose cryogel sponges. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005; 75 (4): 802–809. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30466. PMID: 16138321.

32. Lozinsky VI, Damshkaln LG, Bloch RO, Vardi P, Grinberg NV, Burova TV, Grinberg VYa. Cryostructuring of polymer systems. Preparation and characterization of supermacroporous (spongy) agarose-based cryogels used as three-dimensional scaffolds for culturing insulin-producing cell aggregates. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008; 108 (5): 3046–3062. doi: 10.1002/app.27908.

33. Saldin LT, Cramer MC, Velankar SS, White LJ, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2017; 49: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.068. PMID: 27915024; PMCID: PMC5253110.


Review

For citations:


Baranova N.V., Ponomareva A.S., Belova A.D., Kirsanova L.A., Filin D.D., Nemets E.A., Basok Yu.B., Sevastianov V.I. Decellularized porcine liver scaffold for maintaining the viability and capacity of pancreatic islets. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025;27(1):90-102. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-1-90-102

Views: 153


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)