CARDIAC TRANSPLANT REJECTION AND NON-INVASIVE COMON CAROTID ARTERY WALL FUNCTIONAL INDICES

Allograft rejection would entail an increase in certain blood biomarkers and active substances derived from activated inflammatory cells which could influence entire vascular endothelial function and deteriorate arterial wall stiffness. We propose that carotid wall functional indices measured with non-invasive ultrasound could we valuable markers of the subclinical cardiac allograft rejection. Aim. Our goal was to analyze the clinical utility of functional common carotid wall (CCW) variables measured with high-resolution Doppler ultrasound as a non-invasive screening tool for allograft rejection in cardiac transplant patients (pts). Methods. One hundred and seventy one pts included 93 cardiac recipients, 30 dilated cardiomyopathy waiting list pts, and 48 stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) pts without decompensated heart failure were included. Along with resistive index (Ri), pulsative index (Pi), and CCW intima-media thickness (IMT), CCW rigidity index (iRIG) was estimated using empirical equation. Non-invasive evaluation was performed in cardiac transplant recipients prior the endomyo- cardial biopsy. Results. Neither of Ri, Pi, or CCW IMT were different in studied subgroups. iRIG was signifi- cantly lower in SCAD pts when compared to the dilated cardiomyopathy subgroup. The later had similar values with cardiac transplant recipients without rejection. Antibody-mediated and cellular rejection were found in 22 (23.7%) and 17 (18.3%) cardiac recipients, respectively. Mean iRIG in pts without rejection was significantly lower in comparison to antibody-mediated rejection and cell-mediated (5514.7 ± 2404.0 vs 11856.1 ± 6643.5 and 16071.9 ± 10029.1 cm/sec2, respectively, p = 0.001). Area under ROC for iRIG was 0.90 ± 0.03 units2. Analysis showed that iRIG values above estimated treshold 7172 cm/sec2 suggested relative risk of any type of rejection 17.7 (95%CI = 6.3–49.9) sensitivity 80.5%, specificity – 81.1%, negative predictive value – 84.3%.
Conclusions. Increased carotid wall stiffness is found in patients with both antibody-mediated and cellular car- diac allograft rejection. Non-invasive measurement of carotid artery wall rigidity index with triplex ultrasound is a simple screening tool for risk stratification. Having a functional marker would enable preventive measures to be taken at the early stages. 

1. Готье СВ, Шевченко АО, Попцов ВН. Пациент с трансплантированным сердцем: Руководство для врачей по ведению пациентов, перенесших трансплантацию сердца. М.–Тверь: Триада, 2014: 144. Gautier SV, Shevchenko AO, Poptsov VN. Patsient s transplantirovannym serdtsem: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey po vedeniyu patsientov, perenesshikh transplantatsiyu serdtsa. M.– Tver': Triada, 2014: 144.

2. Taylor DO, Yowell RL, Kfoury AG et al. Allograft coronary artery disease: clinical correlations with circulating anti-HLA antibodies and the immunohistopathologic pattern of vascular rejection. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2000; 19: 518–521.

3. Martínez-Dolz L, Almenar L, Reganon E, Vila V, Sánchez-Soriano R, Martínez-Sales V et al. What is the best biomarker for diagnosis of rejection in heart transplantation? Clin Transplant. 2009; 23 (5): 672–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01074.x.

4. Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A. et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2010; 29: 717–727.

5. Fishbein MC, Kobashigawa J. Biopsy-negative cardiac transplant rejection: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Curr Opion Cardiol. 2004 Mar.; 19 (2): 166–169.

6. Burgess M, Bhattacharyya A, Ray SG. Echocardiography after cardiac transplantation. J Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2002; 15: 917–925.

7. Болезнь коронарных артерий пересаженного сердца / Под ред. ВИ Шумакова. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2008: 160. Bolezn' koronarnyh arterij peresazhennogo serdca / Pod red. VI Shumakova. M.: Medicinskoe informacionnoe agentstvo. 2008: 160.

8. Iyengar S, Feldman DS, Cooke GE, Leier CV, Raman SV. Detection of coronary artery disease in orthotopic heart transplant recipients with 64-detector row computed tomography angiography. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25 (11): 1363–1366.

9. Ames PR, Margarita A et al. Anticardiolipin antibody titre and plasma homocysteine level indepently predict intima media thickness of carotid arteries in subjects with idiopathic antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus. 2002; 11: 208–214.

10. Kossoff G. Accustic parameters to describe diagnostic ultrasound exposure. London. 1998: 3–15.

11. Лелюк ВГ, Лелюк СЭ. Ультразвуковая ангиология. М., 2003: 324. Leljuk VG, Leljuk SJe. Ul'trazvukovaja angiologija. M., 2003: 324.