Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

Development of the kidney transplant program in Uzbekistan: a multi-year analysis of surgical activity and future perspectives

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-263-272

Abstract

Over the past two decades, kidney transplantation (KT) in Uzbekistan has developed unevenly, passing through several stages of growth. Objective: to evaluate these developments by analyzing changes in the volume of transplant procedures, their geographic distribution, and the organization of post-transplant patient follow-up. Materials and methods. The study included 2,803 patients who underwent KT between 2007 and July 2025. Data were obtained from the national registry of recipients of immunosuppressive therapy, as well as from medical institutions at various levels of care. The analysis focused on annual transplant rates, geographic distribution of surgeries, the contribution of individual transplant centers, and the regional distribution of patients during the rehabilitation period. Results. An increase in surgical activity in Uzbekistan became evident only after 2017, with the most pronounced growth in the number of KT procedures observed between 2021 and 2024. During this period, KT transitioned from a rare, high-tech procedure to a routine clinical intervention performed primarily at national transplant centers. The majority of transplantations were carried out at Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery. At the same time, significant regional disparities were identified: most patients continue to receive care in the capital city, while the involvement of regional healthcare institutions remains limited but gradually increasing. Conclusion. The findings indicate the formation of a stable national KT program in Uzbekistan; however, the system of post-transplant follow-up across regions remains inconsistent. Strengthening the capacity of regional and district healthcare facilities, expanding telemedicine services, and enhancing personnel training may improve access to specialized care and reduce the workload on central transplant centers.

About the Authors

S. I. Ismailov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery
Uzbekistan

Tashkent



F. Sh. Bakhritdinov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery
Uzbekistan

Tashkent



A. S. Suyumov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery
Uzbekistan

Tashkent



Z. U. Abdugafurov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery
Uzbekistan

Zafarbek U. Abdugafurov.

10, Kichik Khalka Yuli str., Tashkent, 100115

Phone: +998901120010



References

1. Gautier SV. Advancing transplantology in Russia: innovation pathways and regional deployment. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025; 27 (2): 6–7.

2. Gauthier SV. Complex organ transplants are no longer the preserve of capital clinics. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 2024; January 11. Доступно по/Available at: https://rg.ru/2024/01/11/obyknovennoe-chudo.html.

3. Axelrod DA, Guidinger MK, McCullough KP, Leichtman AB, Punch JD, Merion RM. Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4 (6): 920–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00462.x.

4. Azhar A, Defor E, Bandyopadhyay D, Kamal L, Tanriover B, Gupta G. Long-term effects of center volume on transplant outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients. PLoS One. 2024; 19 (6): e0301425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301425.

5. Babloyan S, Voskanyan M, Shekherdimian S, Nazaryan H, Arakelyan S, Kurkchyan K et al. Kidney transplantation in low-to middle-income countries: outcomes and lessons learned from Armenia. Ann Transplant. 2021; 26: e930943. doi: 10.12659/AOT.930943.

6. Boenink R, Kramer A, Masoud S, Rodríguez‑Benot A, Helve J, Bistrup C et al. International comparison and time trends of first kidney transplant recipient characteristics across Europe: an ERA Registry study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024; 39 (4): 648–658. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad189.

7. Contento MN, Vercillo RN, Malaga‑Dieguez L, Pehrson LJ, Wang Y, Liu M et al. Center volume and kidney transplant outcomes in pediatric patients. Kidney Med. 2020; 2 (3): 297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.01.008.

8. Duong NX, Thai MS, Tran NS, Hoang KC, Chau QT, Ngo XT et al. The impact of socioeconomic factors on kidney transplantation: a systematic review of low-and middle-income countries. Soc Int Urol J. 2024; 5 (5): 349–360. doi: 10.3390/siuj5050054.

9. Furia FF, Shoo JG, Ruggajo PJ, Mngumi JW, Gudila V, Muhiddin MA et al. Establishing kidney transplantation in a low-income country: a case in Tanzania. Ren Replace Ther. 2024; 10 (1): 29. doi: 10.1186/s41100-024-00545-z.

10. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT). International report on organ donation and transplantation activities 2020. Madrid: ONT/WHO; 2021. Available at: https://www.transplant-observatory.org.

11. Guy‑Frank CJ, Persaud K, Butsenko D, Jindal RM, Guy SR. Developing a sustainable renal transplant program in low- and middle-income countries: outcome, challenges, and solutions. World J Surg. 2019; 43 (11): 2658–2665. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05093-w.

12. International Society of Nephrology. ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas. 3rd ed. Brussels: ISN; 2023. Available at: https://www.theisn.org/initiatives/global-kidney-health-atlas/.

13. Merzkani M, Chang SH, Murad H, Lentine KL, Mattu M, Wang M et al. The association of center volume with transplant outcomes in selected high-risk groups in kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2023; 24 (1): 61. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03099-0.

14. Montgomery JR, Sung RS, Woodside KJ. Transplant center volume: is bigger better? Am J Kidney Dis. 2019; 74 (4): 432–434. PMID: 31358310.

15. Nkunu V, Tungsanga S, Diongole HM, Sarki A, Arruebo S, Caskey FJ et al. Landscape of kidney replacement therapy provision in low- and lower-middle income countries: a multinational study from the ISN-GKHA. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4 (12): e0003979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003979.

16. Ramsay AIG, Tomini SM, Gandhi S, Fulop NJ, Morris S. Centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a scoping review of definitions, types, and impact on outcomes. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025; 13 (43): 21–90. doi: 10.3310/REMD6648.

17. Szymańska A, Mucha K, Kosieradzki M, Nazarewski S, Pączek L, Foroncewicz B. Organization of post-transplant care and the 5-year outcomes of kidney transplantation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19 (4): 2010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042010.

18. United States Renal Data System. 2021 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Chapter 11: International Comparisons. Bethesda, MD: NIDDK, NIH; 2021. Available at: https://usrds-adr.niddk.nih.gov/2021.


Review

For citations:


Ismailov S.I., Bakhritdinov F.Sh., Suyumov A.S., Abdugafurov Z.U. Development of the kidney transplant program in Uzbekistan: a multi-year analysis of surgical activity and future perspectives. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2026;28(2):263-272. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-263-272

Views: 46

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)