Laboratory markers associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-202-207
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters in order to identify markers that reflect the pharmaco-kinetics of tacrolimus (Tac). Materials and methods. The study included 35 kidney transplant (KT) recipients, comprising 13 women (37.1%) and 22 men (62.9%), with a median age of 48 years [37–57]. All patients received induction immunosuppressive therapy with monoclonal anti-CD25 antibodies, followed by a maintenance regimen consisting of the calcineurin inhibitor Tac in combination with antiproliferative agents (mycophenolate or azathioprine) and corticosteroids. Tac levels were measured on postoperative days 3, 7, 14, and 30. Complete blood count and biochemical parameters, including creatinine, urea, ferritin, transferrin, C-reactive protein (CRP), sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, total protein, and total bilirubin, were assessed preoperatively and on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 following KT. Results. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between Tac trough (C₀) levels on postoperative days 3 and 7 and total bilirubin levels on day 1 (R = 0.49, p = 0.007; R = 0.48, p = 0.009, respectively). In addition, Tac C₀ level on day 3 showed a positive correlation with total bilirubin levels measured on the same day (R = 0.52, p = 0.006). Conversely, total calcium levels on day 3 were negatively correlated with Tac C₀ levels on days 7 and 14 (R = –0.60, p = 0.031; R = –0.56, p = 0.046, respectively). Conclusion. Total bilirubin levels on postoperative day 1 are directly associated with Tac levels on days 3 and 7 following KT. Additionally, lower total calcium levels on day 3 are associated with higher Tac concentrations on days 7 and 14.
About the Authors
S. L. ZyblevBelarus
Sergey L. Zyblev.
290, Ilyicha str., Gomel, 246040
Phone: +375 029 109-21-09
A. E. Silin
Belarus
Gomel
S. V. Zybleva
Belarus
Gomel
V. N. Martinkov
Belarus
Gomel
A. A. Silina
Belarus
Gomel
B. O. Kabeshev
Belarus
Gomel
A. V. Velichko
Belarus
Gomel
A. S. Knyazyuk
Belarus
Gomel
Z. A. Dundarov
Belarus
Gomel
References
1. Kalachyk AV. Donor related early allograft dysfunction risk factors in cadaveric kidney transplantation. Meditsinskiye novosti. 2018; 4: 37–41. [In Russ, English abstract].
2. Redfield RR, Scalea JR, Zens TJ, Muth B, Kaufman DB, Djamali A et al. Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2016; 29 (1): 81–87. doi: 10.1111/tri.12696.
3. Gaafar A, Iqniebi A, Sheereen A, Eldali A, Turpeinen H, Adra C et al. Study of the cytokine polymorphisms in correlation to rejection and graft survival in renal allograft donors and recipients from a homogenous Saudi population. Transpl Immunol. 2014; 30 (1): 34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2013.11.006.
4. Stolyarevich ES, Tomilina NA. Late dysfunction of the grafted kidney: causes, morphological structure, prophylaxis and treatment. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2009; 11 (3): 114–122. [In Russ, English abstract]. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2009-3-114-122.
5. Cheung CY, Tang SCW. Personalized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton). 2022; 27 (6): 475–483. doi: 10.1111/nep.14035.
6. Stolyarevich ES, Kim JG, Artyukhina LYu, Kurenkova LG, Fedorova ND, Tomilina NA. Approaches to correction of immunosuppressive therapy in chronic nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2012; (3): 26–32. [In Russ, English abstract]. https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2012-0-3-26-32.
7. Nikitin AV. Mechanisms of Nephrotoxic Action of Immunodepressants, Calcineurine Inhibitors. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2014; 59 (1–2): 44–47. [In Russ, English abstract].
8. Andrade‑Sierra J, Alejandro V‑GP, Hernandez‑Reyes H, Mercado‑Jáuregui LA, Chávez‑Iñiguez JS, González-Espinoza E et al. Immunosuppressive Minimization Strategies in Kidney Transplantation. Organ Donation and Transplantation – Current Status and Future Challenges. London, 2018: 353–372. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.77292.
9. Catić‑Đorđević A, Cvetković T, Stefanović N, Veličković-Radovanović R. Current Biochemical Monitoring and Risk Management of Immunosuppressive Therapy after Transplantation. J Med Biochem. 2017; 36 (1): 1–7. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2016-0029.
10. Francke MI, de Winter BCM, Elens L, Lloberas N, Hesselink DA. The pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus and its implications for personalized therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development. 2020; 5 (5): 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808993.2020.1776107.
11. Shabunin AV, Drozdov PA, Makeev DA, Nesterenko IV, Zhuravel OS, Karapetyan LR et al. Personalized dosing protocol for extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients in the early postoperative period. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2023; 25 (1): 52–61. [In Russ, English abstract]. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-52-61.
12. Andrews LM, Hesselink DA, van Gelder T, Koch BCP, Cornelissen EAM, Brüggemann RJM et al. A population pharmacokinetic model to predict the individual starting dose of tacrolimus following pediatric renal transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018; 57 (4): 475–489. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0567-8.
13. Wang P, Zhang Q, Tian X, Yang J, Zhang X. Tacrolimus starting dose prediction based on genetic polymorphisms and clinical factors in chinese renal transplant recipients. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2020; 24 (10): 665–673. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2020.0077.
14. Marquet P, Anglicheau D, Humeau A, Adrouche S, Saada L, Bisiaux J et al. Tacrolimus dose requirement in de novo adult kidney transplant patients treated with adoport® can be anticipated. Transpl Int. 2024; 37: 13495. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.13495.
15. Tharanon V, Iamrahong P, Tuamsem J, Choochaeam K, Auamnoy T, Sobhonslidsuk A. Hemoglobin and total bilirubin may affect tacrolimus clearance in liver transplant patient following the early postoperative period: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2024; 18 (1): 408. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04753-3.
16. Chan S, Burke MT, Johnson DW, Francis RS, Mudge DW. Tacrolimus toxicity due to biliary obstruction in a combined kidney and liver transplant recipient. Case Rep Transplant. 2017; 2017: 9096435. doi: 10.1155/2017/9096435.
17. Kobuchi S, Fukushima K, Maeda Y, Kokuhu T, Ushigome H, Yoshimura N et al. Effects of Cholestasis on Whole Blood Concentration of Tacrolimus, an Immunosuppressant, in Living-Related Liver Transplant Recipients. International Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2013; 4 (10): 432–439. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2013.410078.
18. Bootman MD, Bultynck G. Fundamentals of Cellular Calcium Signaling: A Primer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020; 12 (1): a038802. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038802.
19. Andrews C, Xu Y, Kirberger M, Yang JJ. Structural Aspects and Prediction of Calmodulin-Binding Proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 22 (1): 308. Published 2020 Dec 30. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010308.
20. Takemoto‑Kimura S, Suzuki K, Horigane SI, Kamijo S, Inoue M, Sakamoto M et al. Calmodulin kinases: essential regulators in health and disease. J Neurochem. 2017; 141 (6): 808–818. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14020.
21. Ulengin‑Talkish I, Cyert MS. A cellular atlas of calcineurin signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2023; 1870 (1): 119366. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2022.119366.
Review
For citations:
Zyblev S.L., Silin A.E., Zybleva S.V., Martinkov V.N., Silina A.A., Kabeshev B.O., Velichko A.V., Knyazyuk A.S., Dundarov Z.A. Laboratory markers associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2026;28(2):202-207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-202-207
JATS XML


































