Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

Experimental evaluation of allogeneic and xenogeneic biomaterials for regeneration of circular intestinal defects

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-227-237

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the regenerative potential of allogeneic and xenogeneic biomaterials in the repair of circular bowel defects. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on sexually mature male Wistar rats (1 year old, weighing ~300 g; n = 98). In the experimental group (n = 49), allogeneic decellularized biomaterial (ADB) derived from rat bowel was implanted. In the control group (n = 49), xenogeneic biomaterial derived from the fibrous capsule of a human cadaveric kidney was used. In both groups, a 30-mm segment of the ileum was resected, and the biomaterials were implanted at the defect site as end-to-end tubular grafts of similar dimensions. The implanted biomaterials were subsequently subjected to decellularization and morphological analysis. Results. In the experimental group, 2–3 months after transplantation of ADB, the full architectural structure of the small bowel wall was restored. The implanted biomaterial was completely resorbed and replaced by an organ-specific regenerate, with confirmed presence of blood vessels, nerve fibers, and Peyer’s patches. In the control group, transplantation of xenogeneic biomaterial resulted in 100% mortality within the early postoperative period (7–14 days), associated with graft rejection and a pronounced immune-inflammatory response in the abdominal cavity. Conclusion. The proposed approach promotes regeneration of continuous small bowel segments measuring 30 mm or more and enables restoration of all structural components of the bowel wall. This method shows potential for the treatment of conditions such as short bowel syndrome, inflammatory-destructive bowel diseases, and for the closure of circular defects following bowel resection.

About the Authors

I. M. Nasibullin
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ildar M. Nasibullin.

3, Lenina str., Ufa, 450008

Phone: (905) 000-83-76



R. R. Khasanov
Bashkir State Medical University; Heidelberg University
Germany

Ufa, Russian Federation; Heidelberg, Germany



A. I. Lebedeva
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ufa



O. R. Shangina
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ufa



V. N. Pavlov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ufa



D. E. Khalilov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ufa



References

1. Seetharam P, Rodrigues G. Short bowel syndrome: a review of management options. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17 (4): 229–235. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.82573. PMID: 21727727; PMCID: PMC3133978.

2. Lloyd DA, Vega R, Bassett P, Forbes A, Gabe SM. Survival and dependence on home parenteral nutrition: experience over a 25‐year period in a UK referral centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 24 (8): 1231–1240. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03106.x. PMID: 17014582.

3. Sabharwal G, Strouse PJ, Islam S, Zoubi N. Congenital short-gut syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 2004; 34 (5): 424–427. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1087-2. Epub 2003 Dec 16. PMID: 14676985.

4. Jia Q, Li H, Zhou H, Zhang X, Zhang A, Xie Y et al. Role and effective therapeutic target of gut microbiota in heart failure. Cardiovasc Ther. 2019; 2019: 5164298. doi: 10.1155/2019/5164298.

5. DiMartini A, Rovera GM, Graham TO, Furukawa H, Todo S, Funovits M et al. Quality of life after small intestinal transplantation and among home parenteral nutrition patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998; 22 (6): 357–362. doi: 10.1177/0148607198022006357. PMID: 9829608.

6. Atema JJ, Mirck B, Van Arum I, Ten Dam SM, Serlie MJ, Boermeester MA. Outcome of acute intestinal failure. Br J Surg. 2016; 103 (6): 701–708. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10094. PMID: 26999497.

7. Cowles RA, Ventura KA, Martinez M, Lobritto SJ, Harren PA, Brodlie S et al. Reversal of intestinal failure–associated liver disease in infants and children on parenteral nutrition: experience with 93 patients at a referral center for intestinal rehabilitation. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45 (1): 84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.014. PMID: 20105585.

8. Spagnuolo MI, Cicalese MP, Bruzzese E, Caiazzo MA, Di Caro S, Squeglia V, Guarino A. Eleven years of management of children with intestinal failure and not candidates for intestinal transplantation. Transplant Research and Risk Management. 2010; 2: 71–75. doi: 10.2147/TRRM.S11930.

9. Kaye AJ, Patel SJ, Meyers SR, Ahlawat S. Outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease in hospitalized patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Cureus. 2022; 14 (8): e27656. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27656. PMID: 36072180; PMCID: PMC9439936.

10. Goulet O, Abi Nader E, Pigneur B, Lambe C. Short bowel syndrome as the leading cause of intestinal failure in early life: some insights into the management. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019; 22 (4): 303–329. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2019.22.4.303. PMID: 31338307; PMCID: PMC6629594.

11. Kamalova AA, Podshivalina AA, Sageeva GI, Druzhkova EE. Regional experience in the treatment of children with short bowel syndrome. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2022; 67 (5): 231–236. [In Russ, English abstract]. https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2022-67-5-231-236.

12. Ladd MR, Costello CM, Gosztyla C, Werts AD, Johnson B, Fulton WB et al. Development of intestinal scaffolds that mimic native mammalian intestinal tissue. Tissue Eng Part A. 2019; 25 (17–18): 1225–1241. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2018.0239. PMID: 30652526; PMCID: PMC6760185.

13. Wang Y, Wang Z, Dong Y. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023; 9 (3): 1132–1150. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00730. PMID: 36800415.

14. Binlateh T, Thammanichanon P, Rittipakorn P, Thinsathid N, Jitprasertwong P. Collagen-based biomaterials in periodontal regeneration: current applications and future perspectives of plant-based collagen. Biomimetics (Basel). 2022; 7 (2): 34. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020034. PMID: 35466251; PMCID: PMC9036199.

15. Choi RS, Vacanti JP. Preliminary studies of tissue-engineered intestine using isolated epithelial organoid units on tubular synthetic biodegradable scaffolds. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 848–851. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00164-9. PMID: 9123551.

16. Kim SS, Kaihara S, Benvenuto MS, Choi RS, Kim BS, Mooney DJ et al. Regenerative signals for intestinal epithelial organoid units transplanted on biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering of small intestine 1, 2. Transplantation. 1999; 67 (2): 227–233. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199901270-00007. PMID: 10075585.

17. Kaihara S, Kim SS, Kim BS, Mooney D, Tanaka K, Vacanti JP. Long-term follow-up of tissue-engineered intestine after anastomosis to native small bowel. Transplantation. 2000; 69 (9): 1927–1932. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200005150-00031. PMID: 10830233.

18. Zakhem E, Raghavan S, Bitar KN. Neo-innervation of a bioengineered intestinal smooth muscle construct around chitosan scaffold. Biomaterials. 2014; 35 (6): 1882–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.049. PMID: 24315576.

19. Hori Y, Nakamura T, Kimura D, Kaino K, Kurokawa Y, Satomi S et al. Experimental study on tissue engineering of the small intestine by mesenchymal stem cell seeding. J Surg Res. 2002; 102 (2): 156–160. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6294. PMID: 11796013.

20. Liu Z, Rütten S, Buhl EM, Zhang M, Liu J, Rojas‐González DM et al. Development of a Silk Fibroin‐Small Intestinal Submucosa Small‐Diameter Vascular Graft with Sequential VEGF and TGF‐β1 Inhibitor Delivery for In Situ Tissue Engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2023; 23 (9): 2300184. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202300184.

21. Nakase Y, Hagiwara A, Nakamura T, Kin S, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa T et al. Tissue engineering of small intestinal tissue using collagen sponge scaffolds seeded with smooth muscle cells. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12 (2): 403–412. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.403. PMID: 16548698.

22. Khasanov R, Svoboda D, Tapia‑Laliena MÁ, Kohl M, Maas‑Omlor S, Hagl CI et al. Muscle hypertrophy and neuroplasticity in the small bowel in short bowel syndrome. Histochem Cell Biol. 2023; 160 (5): 391–405. doi: 10.1007/s00418-023-02214-4. PMID: 37395792; PMCID: PMC10624713.

23. Pahari MP, Raman A, Bloomenthal A, Costa MA, Bradley SP, Banner B et al. A novel approach for intestinal elongation using acellular dermal matrix: an experimental study in rats. Transplant Proc. 2006: 38 (6): 1849– 1850. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.05.052. PMID: 16908302.

24. Nakase Y, Nakamura T, Kin S, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa T, Kuriu Y et al. Endocrine cell and nerve regeneration in autologous in situ tissue-engineered small intestine. J Surg Res. 2007; 137 (1): 61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.06.019. PMID: 17084409.

25. Muldashev ER, Muslimov SA, Vyalkov VA, Galimova VU, Nigmatullin RT, Salikhov AYu et al. Biomaterial «Alloplant» dlya regenerativnoy khirurgii. Patent RU 2189257 C1. 2002-09-20. [In Russ, English abstract].

26. Regenerativnaya meditsina. Pod red. E.R. Muldasheva. Ufa: GUP «Bashkortostan», 2014; 432. [In Russ, English abstract].

27. Chen Y, Guo C, Manousiouthakis E, Wang X, Cairns DM, Roh TT et al. Bi‐layered tubular microfiber scaffolds as functional templates for engineering human intestinal smooth muscle tissue. Adv Funct Mater. 2020; 30 (17): 2000543. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202000543. Epub 2020 Feb 27. PMID: 33692658; PMCID: PMC7938961.

28. Lebedeva AI, Muslimov SA, Musina LA. Experimental modeling of the process of chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Journal Biomed. 2013; 1 (4): 114–123. [In Russ, English abstract].

29. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011; 11 (11): 723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. PMID: 21997792; PMCID: PMC3422549.

30. Sicari BM, Johnson SA, Siu BF, Crapo PM, Daly KA, Jiang H et al. The effect of source animal age upon the in vivo remodeling characteristics of an extracellular matrix scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012; 33 (22): 5524–5533. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.017. PMID: 22575834; PMCID: PMC3569720.

31. Liu Z, Zhu J, Li Z, Liu H, Fu C. Biomaterial scaffolds regulate macrophage activity to accelerate bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11: 1140393. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1140393. PMID: 36815893; PMCID: PMC9932600.

32. Lebedeva AI, Gareev EM, Afanasiev SA, Kondratieva DS, Muslimov SA, Popov SV. Allogeneic biomaterial: a fibrosis inhibitor in ischemic myocardial damage. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2023; 25 (2): 301–308. [In Russ, English abstract]. https://doi.org/10.15789/10.15789/1563-0625-ABA-2359.

33. Musina LA, Shakirov RF, Galimova VU, Shangina OR, Lebedeva AI, Kadirov RZ. «Alloplant» biomaterial as the inhibitor of scarring the damaged cornea (immunochistochemical study). Practical medicine. 2019; 17 (1): 112–116. [In Russ, English abstract].

34. Abraham DJ, Shiwen X, Black CM, Sa S, Xu Y, Leask A. Tumor necrosis factor α suppresses the induction of connective tissue growth factor by transforming growth factor-β in normal and scleroderma fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275 (20): 15220–15225. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15220. PMID: 10809757.

35. Censi R, Van Putten S, Vermonden T, Di Martino P, Van Nostrum CF, Harmsen MC et al. The tissue response to photopolymerized PEG‐p (HPMAm‐lactate)‐based hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011; 97 (3): 219–229. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33048. PMID: 21442723.

36. García‑Arrarás JE, Valentín‑Tirado G, Flores JE, Rosa RJ, Rivera‑Cruz A, San Miguel‑Ruiz JE et al. Cell dedifferentiation and epithelial to mesenchymal transitions during intestinal regeneration in H. glaberrima. BMC Dev Biol. 2011; 11 (1): 61. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-61. PMID: 22004330; PMCID: PMC3207902.

37. Reing JE, Zhang L, Myers‑Irvin J, Cordero KE, Freytes DO, Heber‑Katz E et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009; 15 (3): 605–614. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0425. PMID: 18652541.

38. Khodosevich K, Monyer H. Signaling involved in neurite outgrowth of postnatally born subventricular zone neurons in vitro. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11 (1): 18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-18. PMID: 20146799; PMCID: PMC2831042.

39. Rao M, Gershon MD. The bowel and beyond: the enteric nervous system in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 13 (9): 517–528. PMCID: PMC5005185.

40. Fehèr E. Ultrastructural study of nerve terminals in the submucous plexus and mucous membrane after extirpation of the myenteric plexus. Acta Anat (Basel). 1976; 94 (1): 78–88. PMID: 961341.

41. Da Silveira AB, Freitas MA, De Oliveira EC, Neto SG, Luquetti AO, Furness JB et al. Neuronal plasticity of the enteric nervous system is correlated with chagasic megacolon development. Parasitology. 2008; 135 (11): 1337–1342. doi: 10.1017/S0031182008004770. PMID: 18664306.

42. Musina LA, Shangina OR, Nigmatullin RT, Muslimov SA. Experimental muscle reinnervation by allogeneic biomaterial illustrates restoration of interlevel relations in human body. Saratov Medical Journal. 2020; 16 (2): 623–627.

43. Nich C, Takakubo Y, Pajarinen J, Ainola M, Salem A, Sillat T et al. Macrophages – key cells in the response to wear debris from joint replacements. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013; 101 (10): 3033–3045. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34599. Epub 2013 Apr 9. PMID: 23568608; PMCID: PMC3775910.


Review

For citations:


Nasibullin I.M., Khasanov R.R., Lebedeva A.I., Shangina O.R., Pavlov V.N., Khalilov D.E. Experimental evaluation of allogeneic and xenogeneic biomaterials for regeneration of circular intestinal defects. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2026;28(2):227-237. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-227-237

Views: 37

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)