Optimizing maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplantation
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-4-24-30
Abstract
Objective: to justify the rational selection of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy following liver transplantation (LT).
Materials and methods. The study included 42 recipients of deceased donor liver grafts, observed for periods ranging from 1 month to 15 years LT. The mean age at transplantation was 49.4 ± 7.0 years. All patients received everolimus in combination with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus. Indications for everolimus therapy were tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity (n = 13), history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 21), and development of de novo malignancies at non-hepatic sites (n = 8). Target trough concentrations were 2–3 ng/mL for tacrolimus and 3–8 ng/mL for everolimus. Adverse events of everolimus and serum cholesterol dynamics were assessed at 12, 36, 60, and 120 months after conversion to this regimen, and compared with data from 20 randomly selected recipients maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation at the same time points. Liver stiffness (kPa) was measured by transient elastography once at study completion. In patients with a history of HCC, baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were also taken into account.
Results. Long-term use of everolimus with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus did not impair renal function (baseline GFR: 84.13 ± 16.70 mL/min/1.73 m2; final GFR: 84.99 ± 21.30 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, serum cholesterol levels were consistently higher compared with tacrolimus monotherapy (12 months: 5.7 ± 0.91 vs 4.01 ± 1.21 mmol/L; 120 months: 5.52 ± 1.51 vs 4.58 ± 0.72 mmol/L). Among 21 patients with a history of HCC, recurrence or progression occurred in 6 patients (30%), which was associated with elevated baseline AFP levels prior to LT (429.2 ± 306.9 U/mL; Z = 4.2, p = 0.0001). Liver stiffness, assessed once at the endpoint of the retrospective study, averaged 4.8 ± 1.8 kPa, corresponding to F0–1 by the METAVIR scale.
Conclusion. Long-term maintenance therapy with everolimus combined with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus after LT is safe and helps mitigate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless, this regimen does not prevent recurrent HCC, which depends on the biological activity of the tumor.
About the Authors
O. A. GerasimovaRussian Federation
Olga Gerasimova
Address: 70, Leningradskaya str., Pesochnyy, St. Petersburg
N. V. Marchenko
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
I. I. Tileubergenov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
V. N. Zhuykov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Van Gelder T. ESOT Advisory Committee on Generic Substitution. European Society for Organ Transplantation Advisory Committee recommendations on generic substitution of immunosuppressive drugs. Transpl Int. 2011 Dec; 24 (12): 1135–1141. doi: 10.1111/j.14322277.2011.01378.x. PMID: 22032583.
2. Trunečka P. Once-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a ‘me-too drug’, or a therapeutic advantage. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017 Apr; 22 (2): 118–122. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000387. PMID: 28079558.
3. Keating GM, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Everolimus: a guide to its use in liver transplantation. BioDrugs. 2013 Aug; 27 (4): 407–411. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0041-6. PMID: 23696253.
4. Abaalkhail FA, Al Sebayel MI, Shagrani MA, O’Hali WA, Almasri NM, Alalwan AA et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2021 Sep; 42 (9): 927–968. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.9.20210126. PMID: 34470833; PMCID: PMC9280503.
5. Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Guerrero-Misas M, Thorburn D, Davidson BR, Tsochatzis E, Gurusamy KS. Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31; 3 (3): CD011639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011639.pub2.
6. De Simone P, Fagiuoli S, Cescon M, De Carlis L, Tisone G, Volpes R, Cillo U. Consensus Panel. Use of Everolimus in Liver Transplantation: Recommendations From a Working Group. Transplantation. 2017 Feb; 101 (2): 239–251. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001438.
7. Di Maira T, Little EC, Berenguer M. Immunosuppression in liver transplant. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun-Aug; 46–47: 101681. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101681. Epub 2020 Sep 11. PMID: 33158467.
8. Cillo U, De Carlis L, Del Gaudio M, De Simone P, Fagiuoli S, Lupo F et al. Immunosuppressive regimens for adult liver transplant recipients in real-life practice: consensus recommendations from an Italian Working Group. Hepatol Int. 2020 Dec; 14 (6): 930–943. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10091-5. Erratum in: Hepatol Int. 2021 Jun; 15 (3): 831. PMID: 33099753; PMCID: PMC7803715.
9. Mulder MB, van Hoek B, van den Berg AP, Polak WG, Alwayn IPJ, de Jong KP et al. Three-year results of renal function in liver transplant recipients on low-dose sirolimus and tacrolimus: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Liver Transpl. 2023 Feb 1; 29 (2): 184–195. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000003. Epub 2023 Jan 3. PMID: 36668691.
10. Trunečka P, Klempnauer J, Bechstein WO, Pirenne J, Friman S, Zhao A et al. DIAMOND† study group. Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Regimens – The DIAMOND Study. Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul; 15 (7): 1843–1854. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13182. PMID: 25707487; PMCID: PMC5024030.
11. Dumortier J, Duvoux C, Dubel L, Bazin F, Houssel-Debry P. A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Conversion from Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients in France: The COBALT Study. Ann Transplant. 2019 Aug 27; 24: 506–516. doi: 10.12659/AOT.916041. PMID: 31451681; PMCID: PMC6728630.
12. Lee SG, Jeng LB, Saliba F, Singh Soin A, Lee WC, De Simone P et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: 24-month results from the pooled analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials. Transplantation. 2021 Jul 1; 105 (7): 1564–1575. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003394. PMID: 33741847; PMCID: PMC8221719.
13. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022 Mar; 76 (3): 681–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. PMID: 34801630; PMCID: PMC8866082.
14. Poudel S, Gupta S, Saigal S. Basics and Art of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 May-Jun; 14 (3): 101345. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101345. PMID: 38450290; PMCID: PMC10912712.
Review
For citations:
Gerasimova O.A., Marchenko N.V., Tileubergenov I.I., Zhuykov V.N. Optimizing maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplantation. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025;27(4):24-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-4-24-30


































