Correlation analysis of renal scan and volumetric perfusion CT in the assessment of living kidney donors

Objective: to evaluate the correlation between renal scan (RSc) and volumetric multislice computed tomography (perfusion CT) in living kidney donors, with the goal of identifying interchangeable functional parameters and optimizing the preoperative assessment of split renal function. Materials and methods. The study included 54 living kidney donors (totaling 108 kidneys). Split renal function was assessed using RSc with 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) and contrast-enhanced volumetric MSCT. Key parameters from nephroscintigraphy included renal plasma flow (RPF), time to maximum tracer accumulation (Tmax), and excretion half-life (T½). Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) analysis included arterial flow (AF), blood volume (BV), extraction fraction (FE), and indexed extraction fraction (IFE). Correlation between modalities was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plots. Results. Significant correlations were observed between RSc and volumetric MCT parameters. A strong negative correlation was found between Tmax and AF (r = –0.75, p < 0.001), indicating an inverse relationship between blood flow velocity and renal filtration capacity. Similarly, T½ showed a negative correlation with FE (r = –0.75, p < 0.01), suggesting that a shorter tracer half-life corresponds to more efficient renal extraction. A strong positive correlation between RPF and IFE (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) supports the feasibility of using indexed CT perfusion as a surrogate for assessing RPF. Bland-Altman analysis showed that differences between the two diagnostic methods remained within clinically acceptable limits, confirming their potential interchangeability in preoperative donor assessment. Conclusion. The study demonstrates the potential for partial interchangeability between RSc and volumetric CT perfusion in the preoperative assessment of kidney donors. While CT perfusion offers superior accuracy in assessing renal blood flow, nephroscintigraphy remains the method of choice for evaluating excretory function. The combined use of both modalities improves diagnostic accuracy and kidney donor selection, thereby improving the safety of kidney transplant programs.

1. Grenier N, Basseau F. Functional renal imaging: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). Nephrology. 2015; 11 (3): 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2015.05.002.

2. Zhang J, Liu J, Jin Q, Wu W, Li H, Wang J. CT perfusion in renal function assessment: advances and challenges. Journal of Nephrology. 2017; 30 (2): 163–170. doi: 10.1007/s40620-016-0357-6.

3. O’Connor JPB, Port RE, Jayson GC, Waterton JC, Taylor NJ, Robinson SP et al. Imaging biomarkers in kidney disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2014; 10 (7): 442–452. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.86.

4. Sharfuddin A. Imaging evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. Seminars in Nephrology. 2011; 31 (3): 283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.008.

5. Namazova-Baranova LS, Baranov AA, Smirnov IE. Diagnostic Imaging in European Eastern Countries: A Russian Experience. Springer. 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21371-2.18.

6. Rigatelli G, Annie F, Nguyen TAN. Renal Artery Interventions. Practical Handbook of Interventional Cardiology. 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119383031.

7. Sedankin MK, Leushin VY, Gudkov AG. Modeling of Thermal Radiation by the Kidney in the Microwave Range. Biomedical Engineering. 2019; 52 (3): 247–254. doi: 10.1007/s10527-019-09908.

8. Lammer J. Occlusive Vascular Diseases of the Abdomen. Springer. 1999. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-2141-9.45.

9. Lim R, Kwatra N, Valencia VF. Review of the clinical and technical aspects of 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal imaging: the comeback «kit». Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2024; 52 (3): 199–208. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.122.263043.

10. Tarkhanov A, Bartal G, Druzhin S, Shakhbazyan R. Bladder wall and surrounding tissue necrosis following bilateral superselective embolization of internal iliac artery branches due to uncontrollable haematuria. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR). 2018. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0043.

11. Abdullaev AYY. Organization of Healthcare. VSKM Journal. 2015.

12. Dovbysh MA, Mishchenko OM. Topical issues of modern urology: educational manual. ZSMU Repository. 2023.

13. Kogan MI, Sizov VV, Babich II, Shidaev A. Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis in a 7-Year-Old Girl. Vestnik, 2020.

14. Stus VP, Moiseyenko MM, Polion MY. Urology (Methodical elaborations of practical classes for students). DMA Repository. 2020.

15. Xihong H. MRI with SENSE evaluation of conotruncal defects in children. Pediatric Radiology. 2008; 38 (5): 550–556. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-0840.

16. Sharfuddin A. Imaging evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. Seminars in Nephrology. 2011; 31 (3): 283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.008.

17. Gubar AO. Urology: A Manual for Teachers Preparing for Practical Classes. ZSMU Repository. 2021: 1–156.

18. Gorbatko OA, Borsukov AV. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the early diagnosis of clinically significant angionephrosclerosis: Advances and clinical applications. Medical Visualization Journal. 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21371-2.

19. Rigatelli G, Annie F, Nguyen TAN. CT and MRI magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery interventions. Practical Handbook of Interventional Cardiology. 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119383031.ch21.

20. Leushin VY, Gudkov AG, Sedankin MK. Thermal radiation modeling of kidneys: assessment and applications in biomedical engineering. Biomedical Engineering. 2019; 52 (3): 247–254. doi: 10.1007/s10527-019-09908-x.