ОСОБЕННОСТИ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ МЕХАНИЧЕСКОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ КРОВООБРАЩЕНИЯ С ПОМОЩЬЮ НАСОСОВ НЕПРЕРЫВНОГО ПОТОКА
Аннотация
В обзоре проведен сравнительный анализ методов и средств для длительной механической поддержки кровообращения с помощью имплантируемых насосов непрерывного и пульсирующего потока. Особое внимание уделено выбору оптимальных режимов работы насосов с учетом физических принципов взаи- модействия стационарного потока крови с пульсирующей механикой камер сердца.
Об авторах
Г. П. Иткин
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
Е. Г. Шохина
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
С. Ю. Шемакин
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
В. Н. Попцов
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
Д. В. Шумаков
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
С. В. Готье
ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. Москва
Список литературы
1. Slaughter M.S., Rogers J.G., Milano C.A., Russell S.D. et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 2241–2251.
2. John R. Current axial-flow devices – the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 264–272.
3. Fang J.C. Rise of the machines – left ventricular assist devices as permanent therapy for advanced heart failu- re // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 1–3.
4. Frazier O.H., Jacob L.P. Small Pumps for Ventricular Assistance: Progress in Mechanical Circulatory // Cardi- ol. Clin. 2007. P. 253–256.
5. John R., Naka Y., Smedira N.G., Starling R., et al. Con- tinuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 Oct. Vol. 92 (4). P. 1406–1413.
6. Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. P. 312–321.
7. Fonarow G.C., Heywood J.T. et al. Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for heart failu- re hospitalisations, 2002 to 2004: findings from Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (AD- HERE) // Am. Heart. J. 2007. Vol. 153 (6). P. 1021–1028.
8. Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.
9. Miller L.W., Pagani F.D., Russell S.D. et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart trans- plantation // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 357. P. 885–896.
10. Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. Vol. 312–321.
11. Radovancevic B., Vrtovec B., de Kort E. et al. End-or- gan function in patients on long-term circulatory sup- port with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2007. Vol. 26 (8). P. 815– 818.
12. John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to- transplant therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 1227–1234; discussion 34–35.
13. Patel N.D., Weiss E.S., Schaffer J. et al. Right Heart Dys- function After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implan- tation: A Comparison of the Pulsatile HeartMate I and Axial-Flow HeartMate II Devices // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 832–840.
14. Westaby S., Siegenthaler M., Beyersdorf F. et al. Destina- tion therapy with a rotary blood pump and novel power delivery // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010 Feb. Vol. 37 (2). P. 350–356.
15. Lietz K. Destination Therapy: Patient Selection and Cur- rent Outcomes // J. Card. Surg. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 462–471.
16. Westaby S., Frazier O.H., Banning A. Six Years of Con- tinuous Mechanical Circulatory Support // N. Engl. J.
17. Med. 2006. Vol. 355 (3). P. 326–328.
18. Garatti A., Bruschi G., Colombo T., Russo C. et al. Clini-
19. cal outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricu- lar assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices // Eur. J. Car- diothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 275–280.
20. Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.
21. Slaughter M.S., Pagani F.D., Rogers J.G. et al. Clini- cal management of continuous-flow left ventricular as- sist devices in advanced heart failure // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2010 Apr. Vol. 29 (4 Suppl). P. S1–39.
22. Myers T.J., Bolmers M., Gregoric I.D., Kar B., Fra- zier O.H. Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2009. Vol. 28. P. 423–427.
23. Mudd J.O., Cuda J.D., Halushka M. et al. Fusion of aor- tic valve commissures in patients supported by a conti- nuous axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 1269–1274.
24. Letsou G.V., Connelly J.H., Delgado R.M. et al. Is native aortic valve commissural fusion in patients with long- term left ventricular assist devices associated with cli- nically important aortic insufficiency? // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 395–399.
25. Ochiai Y., McCarthy P.M., Smedira N.G. et al. Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 pati- ents // Circulation. 2002. Vol. 106. P. I198–202.
26. Struber M., Sander K., Lahpor J. et al. HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 289–294.
27. Amir O., Bracey A.W., Smart F.W. et al. A successful anti- coagulation protocol for the first HeartMate II implantati- on in the United States // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2005. Vol. 32. P. 399–401.
28. John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular as- sist device // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 136. P. 1318–1323.
29. Frazier O.H., Delgado R.M., Kar B. et al. First clinical use of the redesigned HeartMate II left ventricular assist system in the United States: a case report // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2004. Vol. 31. P. 157–159.
30. Frazier O.H., Myers T.J., Jarvik R.K. et al. Research and development of an implantable axial-flow left ventricu- lar assist device: the Jarvik 2000 Heart // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71. Suppl. 3. P. S125–S132.
31. Westaby S., Jarvik R., Freeland A. et al. Postauricular percutaneous power delivery for permanent mechanical circulatory support // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 977–983.
32. Siegenthaler M.P., Martin J., Pernice K. et al. The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMa- te left ventricular assist device // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 23. P. 748–754.
33. Saleem Haj-Yahia S., Birks E.J., Rogers P. et al. Midterm experience with the Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricu- lar assist device // J. Thorac. and Cardiovasc. Surgery. 2011. Vol. 134 (1201). P. 199–203.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Иткин Г.П., Шохина Е.Г., Шемакин С.Ю., Попцов В.Н., Шумаков Д.В., Готье С.В. ОСОБЕННОСТИ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ МЕХАНИЧЕСКОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ КРОВООБРАЩЕНИЯ С ПОМОЩЬЮ НАСОСОВ НЕПРЕРЫВНОГО ПОТОКА. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2012;14(2):110-115. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2012-2-110-115
For citation:
Itkin G.P., Shokhina E.G., Shemakin S.Y., Poptsov V.N., Shumakov D.V., Gautier S.V. FEATURES OF LONG-TERM MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT WITH CONTINUOUS-FLOW PUMP. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2012;14(2):110-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2012-2-110-115
Просмотров: 702
Послать статью по эл. почте 