MULTIFACTORIAL ASSESSMENT OF POSTMORTEM LUNG DONOR
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2013-1-12-20
Abstract
The appropriate evaluation and the development of special measures to protect donor lungs are important factors for successful lung transplantation. Aim. To develop and determine the effectiveness of the protocol of morpho- functional assessment of potential lung donor. Methods and results. During the period from May, 2011 to May, 2012, 37 donors with diagnoses of brain death were surveyed. 5 bilateral lung transplantations were performed only in 2 cases donors have been evaluated as «ideal». In the majority of recipients early postoperative period was evaluated as satisfactory. Conclusion. Designed multivariate algorithm of donor with brain death assess- ment, effectively implemented through the selection of donors for lung transplantation with satisfactory results in the early postoperative period. However, compliance with ideal criteria will not allow to effectively provide care for patients with terminal lung disease under conditions of continuous growth of «waiting list».
About the Authors
M. S. Khubutiya
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
E. A. Tarabrin
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
S. V. Golovinsky
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
M. M. Abakumov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
V. L. Vinogradov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
M. G. Minina
Moscow Coordination Center for Organ Donation, Moscow
D. H. Tsurova
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
N. N. Levitskaya
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
A. M. Gasanov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
S. V. Galayko
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
M. V. Samsonova
Research Institute of Pulmonology, Moscow
References
1. Закон РФ «О трансплантации органов и (или) тка- ней» No 4180–1 от 22.12.1992 г.
2. Багненко С.Ф., Полушин Ю.С., Мойсюк Я.Г. и др. Анализ причин дефицита доноров органов и основ- ные направления его преодоления // Трансплантоло- гия. 2011. No 2–3. С. 10–22.
3. Готье С.В., Мойсюк Я.Г., Хомяков С.М. Развитие ор- ганного донорства и трансплантации в Российской Федерации в 2006–2010 годах. III сообщение реги- стра Российского трансплантологического обще- ства // Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2011. Т. XIII. No 2. С. 6–20.
4. Леонов С.А., Огрызко Е.В., Зайченко Н.М. О неко- торых особенностях травматизма в Российской Фе- дерации: [электрон. ресурс] «Социальные аспекты здоровья населения» 2009. No 3 (11). Режим досту- па: URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/143/30/ lang,ru/
5. Barr M.L., Kawut S.M., Whelan T.P. et al. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dys- function, part IV: Recipient-related risk factors and markers // Heart Lung Transplant. 2005. Vol. 24 (10). P. 1468–1482.
6. Botha P., Rostron A.J., Fisher A.J., Dark J.H. Current strategies in donor selection and management // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 20 (2). P. 143–151.
7. Botha P. Extended donor criteria in lung transplantati- on // Curr. Opin. Organ. Transplant. 2009. Vol. 14 (2). P. 206–210.
8. de Perrot M., Bonser R.S., Dark J. et al. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dysfunction, part III: Donor-related risk factors and markers // J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2005. Vol. 24 (10). P. 1460–1467.
9. Domínguez-Gil B., Delmonico F.L., Shaheen F.A. et al. The critical pathway for deceased donation: reporta- ble uniformity in the approach to deceased donation // Transplant int. 2011. Vol. 24 (4). P. 373–378.
10. Orens J.B., Boehler A., de Perrot M. et al. A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria // J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2003. Vol. 22 (11). P. 1183–1200.
11. Reyes K.G., Mason D.P., Thuita L. et al. Guidelines for donor lung selection: time to revision? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010. Vol. 89 (6). P. 1756–1764.
12. Riou B., Guesde R., Jacquens Y. et al. Fiberoptic bron- choscopy in brain-dead organ donors // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1994. Vol. 150 (2). P. 558–560.
13. Snell G.I., Levvey B.J., Oto T. et al. Early lung transplan- tation success utilizing controlled donation after cardi- ac death donors // Am. J. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 8 (6). P. 1282–1289.
14. Snell G.I., Westall G.P. Selection and management of lung donor // Clin. chest. med. 2011. Vol. 32 (2). P. 223– 232.
15. Sommers K.E., Griffith B.P., Hardesty R.L., Keenan R.J. Early lung allograft function in twin recipients from the same donor: risk factor analysis // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996. Vol. 62 (3). P. 784–790.
16. Steen S., Liao Q., Wierup P.N. et al. Transplantation of lungs from non-heart-beating donors after functional as- sessment ex vivo // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 76 (1). P. 244–252.
17. Sundaresan S., Trachiotis G.D., Aoe M. et al. Donor lung procurement: assessment and operative technique // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993. Vol. 56 (6). P. 1409–1413.
18. Toledo-Pereyra L.H. Organ preservation for transplanta- tion. USA: Landes Bioscience. 2010. 266 p.
19. Vigneswaran W.T., Garrity E.R. Jr. Lung transplantation. UK: Informa Healthcare, 2010. 448 p.
20. Ware L.B., Wang Y., Fang X. et al. Assessment of lung rejected for transplantation and implication for donor se- lection // Lancet. 2002. Vol. 360 (9333). P. 619–620.
Review
For citations:
Khubutiya M.S., Tarabrin E.A., Golovinsky S.V., Abakumov M.M., Vinogradov V.L., Minina M.G., Tsurova D.H., Levitskaya N.N., Gasanov A.M., Galayko S.V., Samsonova M.V. MULTIFACTORIAL ASSESSMENT OF POSTMORTEM LUNG DONOR. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2013;15(1):12-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2013-1-12-20
Views:
1423
Email this article 