Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

Biomedical cell product model for preclinical studies carried out on a large laboratory animal

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2020-1-142-156

Abstract

Objective: to develop a model of a biomedical cell product that is consistent with the «homologous drug» strategy  based on protocols for preparing the cell component and scaffold carrier for preclinical studies on a large laboratory  animal (pig). Materials and methods. Biomedical cell products and skin equivalents (SE), were formed using  plasma cryoprecipitate prepared from blood plasma of healthy donors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of  human adipose tissue. Cryoprecipitate from pig blood plasma and human adipose tissue-derived MSCs were used   to form model skin equivalents (mSE). Bright-field microscopy, phase-contrast microscopy (Leica DMI 3000B)  and fluorescence microscopy (Cytation 5 imager; BioTek, USA) were used to monitor the state of cells in the  culture and in the composition of the equivalents. Scaffolds for equivalents were tested for cytotoxicity (MTT test,  direct contact method). The cell distribution density was characterized by author’s method (Patent No. 2675376  of the Russian Federation). Results. An mSE was developed for preclinical studies on a large laboratory animal  (pig). In the mSE, components that change from halogen to xenogenic conditions during transplantation to the  animal were replaced. A comprehensive approach to preparing mSE was presented. It includes sampling of primary  pig biomaterial, extraction and characterization of adipose tissue-derived MSCs, preparation of a scaffold  carrier for the corresponding «homologous drug» strategy. Cytotoxicity of the mSE scaffold was evaluated. It  was shown that mSE provides mechanical support (similar to SE) to cells, as well as comparable development of  cellular events during cultivation. Conclusion. A model of a biomedical cell product was developed. This model  is consistent with the «homologous drug» strategy for preclinical studies on a large laboratory animal (pig). The  paper presented a comprehensive approach to developing a model equivalent based on protocols for preparation  and testing of the cellular component, the scaffold carrier and the ready-to-use model equivalent.

About the Authors

M. N. Egorikhina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Egorikhina Marfa Nikolaevna. 

22, Semashko str., Nizhny Novgorod, 603600



D. Ya. Aleinik
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


Yu. P. Rubtsova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


I. N. Charykova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


A. A. Struchcov
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


A. A. Ezhevskaya
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


V. I. Zagrekov
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


L. N. Sosnina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


E. V. Zagaynova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod


References

1. La Francesca S, Aho JM, Barron MR, Blanco EW, Soliman S, Kalenjian L et al. Long-term regeneration and remodeling of the pig esophagus after circumferential resection using a retrievable synthetic scaffold carrying autologous cells. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 4123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22401-x.

2. Lin C, Chiu P, Hsueh Y, Shieh S, Wu C, Wong T et al. Regeneration of rete ridges in Lanyu pig (Sus scrofa): Insights for human skin wound healing Short running title: Full-thickness wound healing in the Lanyu Pig. Exp Dermat. 2019; 4: 472–479. doi: 10.1111/exd.13875.

3. Davidson JM. Animal models for wound repair. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998; 290: S1–S11.

4. Hammond SA, Tsonis C, Sellins K, Rushlow K, Scharton- Kersten T, Colditz I, Glenn GM. Transcutaneous immunization of domestic animals: Opportunities and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000; 43: 45–55. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00076-4.

5. Wollina U, Berger U, Mahrle G. Immunohistochemistry of porcine skin. Acta Histochem. 1991; 90: 87–91. doi: 10.1016/S0065-1281(11)80166-2.

6. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. Perspective article. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen Med. 2001; 9: 66–76.

7. Mair KH, Sedlak C, Käser T, Pasternak A, Levast B, Gerner W et al. The porcine innate immune system: An update. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014; 45: 321–343. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.022.

8. Summerfield A, Meurens F, Ricklin ME. The immunology of the porcine skin and its value as a model for human skin. Mol Immunol. 2015; 66: 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.10.023.

9. Wang M, Yuan Q, Xie L. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Immunomodulation: Properties and Clinical Application. Stem Cells Int. 2018: 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2018/3057624.

10. Egorikhina MN, Levin GY, Charykova IN, Alejnik DY, Sosnina LN. Patent. 2653434 RU, Int. Cl. C12N 5/00. Method for creating a bioresorbable cellular scaffold based on fibrin of blood plasma. Application: 2017112424, 11.04.2017. Bull. 2018: 13.

11. Semenycheva LL, Astanina MV, Kuznetsova JL, Valetova NB, Geras’kina EV, Tarankova OA. Patent. 2567171 Int. Cl. C08H 1/06, A23J 1/04. Method for production of acetic dispersion of high molecular fish collagen. Bull. 2015: 31.

12. Egorikhina MN, Levin GYa, Aleinik DYa, Charykova IN, Rubtsovа YuP, Sosnina LN, Davydenko DV. Scaffold for Substitution of Skin Defects Based on Natural Biopolymers. Biol Bull Rev. 2018; 137: 273–282. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.7868/S0042132418030055.

13. Egorikhina MN, Charykova IN, Aleinik DYa. Patent № 2675376 The Russian Federation, Int. Cl. G01N 33/52. Method of quantitative analysis of cellular components of scaffold. Application: 2017125696, 17.07.2017, Bull. 2018.

14. Niemeyer P, Szalay K, Luginbühl R, Südkamp NP, Kasten P. Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a non-autogenous setting for bone regeneration in a rabbit critical-size defect model. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 900–908. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.007.

15. Chen Y, Liu H, Chang Y, Cheng Y, Mersmann HJ, Kuo W, Ding S. Isolation and Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells from Porcine Subcutaneous Adipose Tissues. J Vis Exp. 2016; 109: e53886. doi: 10.3791/53886.

16. Jeon BG, Bharti D, Lee WJ, Jang SJ, Park JS, Jeong GJ, Rho GJ. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from various tissues of isogenic minipig. Animal Cells Syst (Seoul). 2015; 19: 407–416. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2015.1089323.

17. Qu CQ, Zhang GH, Zhang LJ, Yang GS. Osteogenic and adipogenic potential of porcine adipose mesenchymal stem cells. In vitro Cell. Dev Biol Anim. 2007; 43: 95– 100. doi: 10.1007/s11626-006-9008-y.

18. Sondeen JL, De Guzman R, Amy Polykratis I, Dale Prince M, Hernandez O, Cap AP, Dubick MA. Comparison between human and porcine thromboelastograph parameters in response to ex vivo changes to platelets, plasma, and red blood cells. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013; 24: 818–829. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3283646600.

19. Schmidt JA, Rinaldi S, Scalbert A, Ferrari P, Achaintre D, Gunter MJ et al. Plasma concentrations and intakes of amino acids in male meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans: A cross-sectional analysis in the EPICOxford cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016; 70: 306–312. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.144.

20. Nascimento B, Goodnough LT, Levy JH. Cryoprecipitate therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 113: 922–934. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu158.

21. Lee MN, Hwang HS, Oh SH, Roshanzadeh A, Kim JW, Song JH et al. Elevated extracellular calcium ions promote proliferation and migration of mesenchymal stem cells via increasing osteopontin expression. Exp Mol Med. 2018; 50: 142. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0170-6.

22. Gharibi B, Hughes FJ. Effects of Medium Supplements on Proliferation, Differentiation Potential, and in vitro Expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012: 771–782. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2010-0031.

23. Caliari SR, Burdick JA. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods. 2016; 13: 405–414. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3839.

24. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev. 2001; 101: 1869–1879. doi: 10.1021/cr000108x.

25. Sadeghi-Ataabadi M, Mostafavi-pour Z, Vojdani Z, Sani M, Latifi M, Talaei-Khozani T. Fabrication and characterization of platelet-rich plasma scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017; 71: 372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.001.

26. Weisel JW, Nagaswami C. Computer modeling of fibrin polymerization kinetics correlated with electron microscope and turbidity observations: clot structure and assembly are kinetically controlled. Biophys J. 1992; 63: 111–128. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81594-1.

27. Shpichka AI, Koroleva AV, Deiwick A, Timashev PS, Semenova EF, Moiseeva IY et al. Evaluation of the vasculogenic potential of hydrogels based on modified fibrin. Cell tissue biol. 2017; 11: 81–7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1990519X17010126.

28. Subhan F, Ikram M, Shehzad A, Ghafoor A. Marine Collagen: An Emerging Player in Biomedical applications. J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 52: 4703–4707. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1652-8.

29. Lausch AJ, Chong LC, Uludag H, Sone ED. Multiphasic Collagen Scaffolds for Engineered Tissue Interfaces. Adv Funct Mater. 2018; 28: 1–9. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804730.


Review

For citations:


Egorikhina M.N., Aleinik D.Ya., Rubtsova Yu.P., Charykova I.N., Struchcov A.A., Ezhevskaya A.A., Zagrekov V.I., Sosnina L.N., Zagaynova E.V. Biomedical cell product model for preclinical studies carried out on a large laboratory animal. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2020;22(1):142-156. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2020-1-142-156

Views: 1029


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)