COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE LIVER AFTER LAPAROTOMY IN DONOR MULTIORGAN
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2012-1-41-49
Abstract
The macroscopical evaluation of the liver of 310 donors is presented and the ball estimation of liver quality is develo- ped. In 181 cases the retrospective morphological evaluation was performed (58.6%) undesirable pathology of donor liver – the fatty dystrophy (steatosis) was frequent. It is proved that most trustworthy information about the condition of donor liver is its complex evaluation including visual survey and biopsy with staining on fat that. It coned promote increase in a donor pool at 10%.
About the Authors
M.S. Hubutia
N.V. Sklifоsovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V.A. Gulyaev
N.V. Sklifоsovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L.N. Zimina
N.V. Sklifоsovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M.S. Novrusbekov
N.V. Sklifоsovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M.G. Minina
N.V. Sklifоsovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Галанкина И.Е. Патологоанатомические аспекты трансплантированных органов // Галанкина И.Е. Зимина Л.Н. Трансплантация органов и тканей в многопрофильном научном центре / Под ред. М.Ш. Хубутия. М.: Аир Атр, 2011. Глю 13. С. 347–378.
2. Шерлок Ш., Дулт Дж. Заболевания печени и желчных путей. М.: ГЭОТАР; 1999. С. 815–840.
3. Adam R., Reynes M., Johann M. et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation // Transplant Proc. 1991. Vol. 23. P. 1538–1539.
4. Donnelly K.L., Smith C.I., Schwarzenberg S.J. et al. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease // J. Clin. Invest. 2005. Vol. 115. P. 1343–1351.
5. Feng S., Goodrich N.P., Bragg-Gresham J.L. et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index // Am. J. Transplant. 2006. Vol. 6. P. 783–790.
6. Fishbein T.M., Fiel M.I., Emre S. et al. Use of livers with microvesicular fat safely expands the donor pool // Transplantation. 1997. Vol. 64. P. 248–251.
7. Frankel W.L., Tranovich J.G., Salter L. et al. The optimal number of donor biopsy sites to evaluate liver histology for transplantation // Liver Transpl. 2002. Vol. 8. P. 1044–1050.
8. Fromenty B., Pessayre D. Inhibition of mitochondrial betaoxidation as a mechanism of hepatotoxicity // Pharmacol Ther. 1995. Vol. 67. P. 101–154.
9. Durand F., John F. Renz., Alkofer B. et al. Report of the Paris Consensus Meeting on Expanded Criteria Donors in Liver Тransplantation // Liver transplantation. 2008. Vol. 14. P. 1694–1707.
10. Garcia Urena M.A., Colina Ruiz-Delgado F., Moreno Gonzalez E. et al. Hepatic steatosis in liver transplant donors: common feature of donor population? // World J. Surg. 1998. Vol. 22. P. 837–844.
11. Hoofnagle J.H., Lombardero M., Zetterman R.K. et al. Donor age and outcome of liver transplantation // Hepatology. 1996. Vol. 24. P. 89–96.
12. Imber C.J., Peter S.D., Handa A., Friend P.J. Hepatic Steatosis and Its Relationship to Transplantation // Liver Transplantation. 2002. Vol. 8. P. 415–423.
13. Imber C.J., St Peter S.D., Lopez I. et al. Current practice regarding the use of fatty livers: a trans-Atlantic survey // Liver Transplantation. 2002. Vol. 8. P. 545–550.
14. Loinaz C., Gonza`lez E.M. Marginal donors in liver transplantation // Heptogastroenterology. 2000. Vol. 47. P. 256–263.
15. McCormack L., Petrowsky H., Jochum W. et al. Use of severely steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study //Ann Surg. 2007. Vol. 246. P. 940–946; discussion 946–948.
16. Markin R.S., Wisecarver J.L., Radio S.J. et al. Frozen section evaluation of donor livers before transplantation // Transplantation. 1993. Vol. 56. P. 1403–1409.
17. Mackersie R.C., Bronsther O.L., Shackford S.R. Organ procurement in patients with fata! head injuries. The fate of the potential donor // Ann Surg. 1991. Vol. 213. P. 143–150.
18. Miller C., Mazzaferro V., Makowka L. et al. Rapid flush technique for donor hepatectomy: Safety and efficacy of an improved method of liver recovery for transplantation // Transplant Prc. 1988. Vol. 20. Suppl. 1. P. 948–950.
19. Nocito A., El-Bardy A.M., Clavien P.A. When is steatosis too much for transplantation? // J. Hepatol. 2006. Vol. 45. P. 494–499.
20. Verran D., Kusyk T., Painter D. et al. Clinical experience gained from the use of 120 steatotic donor livers for orthotopic liver transplantation // Liver Transplant. 2003. Vol. 9. P. 500–505.
21. Starzl Т.Е., Miller C.M., Bronznick B., Makowka L. An improved technique for multiple organ harvesting // Surg. Gynecol. Obst. 1987. Vol. 165. P. 343–348.
22. Urena M.A., Ruiz-Delgado F.C., Gonzalez E.M. et al. Assessing risk of the use of livers with macro and microsteatosis in a liver transplant program // Transplant Proc. 1998. Vol. 30. P. 3288–3291.
23. Urena M.A., Moreno Gonzalez E. et al. An approach to the rational use of steatotic donor livers in liver transplantation // Hepatogastroenterology. 1999. Vol. 46. P. 1164–1173.
24. Wong V.S., Dwight D.G., Palmer C.R., Alexander G.L. Fibrosis and other histological features in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a statistical model // J. Clin. Pathol. 1996. Vol. 49. P. 465–469.
Review
For citations:
Hubutia M., Gulyaev V., Zimina L., Novrusbekov M., Minina M. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE LIVER AFTER LAPAROTOMY IN DONOR MULTIORGAN. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2012;14(1):41-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2012-1-41-49
Views:
734
Email this article 