Deflection of deceased organ donation by society: reasons and structure of mortal fears
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2019-1-169-179
Abstract
From the standpoint of social and humanitarian knowledge, the article analyzes the problem of the shortage of donor organs and resistance to the practice of deceased donation. Within the framework of a broad historical perspective, ancient and modern mortal fears are considered, the connection between the formation of modern medicine and the practice of dealing with the bodies of deceased people is discussed. The influence of social crises on the growth of social mistrust in relation to medicine and transplantations is analyzed. The role of mass media in shaping the negative image of organ donation is discussed and the question of the need for changing media policy is raised.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. N. ReznikRussian Federation
3, Budapest str., St. Petersburg, 192242.
Теl. (921) 935-51-91.
A. M. Prilutskii
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg
V. Yu. Lebedev
Russian Federation
Tver
D. V. Mikhel
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. М.: Ad Marginem Press, 2016: 7–9 [in Russ.].
2. Tolstoy LN. Collected works: Volume 10. Works of 1872–1890., M. State publishing house of artistic literature, 1958: 139, 165–166 [in Russ.].
3. Aries Ph. Images of man and death [in Russ.].
4. Prot. Alexander Shmeman. Death as a «practical problem» Otechestvennye zapiski. 2013; 5: 33–45 [in Russ.].
5. Foucault M. The birth of clinic [in Russ.].
6. Mikhel’ DV. Embodied man: western culture, medical control, and body. Saratov, 2000 [in Russ.].
7. Mikhel’ DV. Power, knowledge and dead body: a historian and anthropological analysis of anatomy practices in the West in the age of early modernity. Logos. 2003; 4–5 (39): 219–233 [in Russ.].
8. Lock M, Nguyen V-K. An anthropology of biomedicine. Oxford: 2010.
9. Capron A. 1991 Guiding Principles: Roots and Implications. Ethics. Access and Safety in Tissue and Organ Transplantation: Issues of Global Concern. Madrid, Spain, 6–9 October 2003. Report. Geneva: WHO, 2004: 8–9.
10. Richardson R. Death, dissection, and the destitute. London, 1987.
11. Burell S, Gill G. The Liverpool cholera epidemic of 1832 and anatomical dissection – medical mistrust and civil unrest. Journal of history medicine and allied sciences. 1905; 60 (4): 478–498.
12. Bogdanov KA. Physicians, patients and readers: pathography texts in Russian culture of XVIII and XIX centuries. M., 2005 [in Russ.].
13. Lotman MYu. On semiotics of fear in Russian culture. Semiotics of fear. A collection of essays. Edited by Nora Bux and Francis Kont. M., 2005: 13–35 [in Russ.].
14. Prilutskii AM. Semiotic and hermeneutical specifics of the discourse of fear at modern marginal religiosity. Journal of the Russian Christian academy for the humanities. 2017; 18 (1): 185–193 [in Russ.].
15. Karaeva O. Organ donation: problems and development perspectives in Russia. M., 2013 [in Russ.].
16. McLuhan M. The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man [in Russ.].
17. McLuhan M. Understanding media: the extensions of man [in Russ.].
18. Scheper-Hughes N. Theft of life: the globalization of organ stealing rumours. Anthropology today. 1996; 12 (3): 3–11.
19. Sanal A. «Robin Hood» of techno-turkey or organ trafficking in the state of ethical beings. Culture, medicine, and psychiatry. 2004; 28: 281–309.
20. Crowley-Matoka M. Domesticating organ transplant: familial sacrifice and national aspiration in Mexico. Durham, 2016.
Review
For citations:
Reznik O.N., Prilutskii A.M., Lebedev V.Yu., Mikhel D.V. Deflection of deceased organ donation by society: reasons and structure of mortal fears. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2019;21(1):169-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2019-1-169-179