PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND REHABILITATION OF RECIPIENTS OF DONOR ORGANS
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2016-2-37-45
Abstract
The paper analyzes the nature of psychological adaptation and rehabilitation of patients, recipients of solid organs. The results of the clinical and psychological work with patients, recipients of donor organs, carried out in theSverdlovskRegionalClinicalHospital№ 1 are shown. Special attention has been paid to the study of motivation as the main psychological factor in the process of adaptation and rehabilitation. We have also shown the infl uence of body image and self-evaluation on the emotional state of patients after the operation. Special stress is laid on the significance of psychological factors which improve the quality of the patient’s life. The main principles and the system of psychological rehabilitation are presented.
About the Authors
S. V. GautierRussian Federation
N. F. Klimusheva
Russian Federation
References
1. Михайличенко ТГ. Сравнительное исследование структуры эмоциональных нарушений у больных до и после ортотопической трансплантации печени / Т.Г. Михайличенко, О.А. Герасимова, Ф.К. Жеребцов [и др.]. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2001; XIII; 2: 52–57. Mihajlichenko TG. Sravnitel’noe issledovanie struktury ehmocional’nyh narushenij u bol’nyh do i posle ortotopicheskoj transplantacii pecheni / T.G. Mihajlichenko, O.A. Gerasimova, F.K. Zherebcov [i dr.]. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennyh organov. 2001; XIII; 2: 52–57.
2. Саперов ВН. Трансплантология в России: достижения и нерешенные проблемы. Здравоохранение Чувашии. 2013; 4. Saperov VN. Transplantologiya v Rossii: dostizheniya i nereshennye problemy. Zdravoohranenie Chuvashii. 2013; 4.
3. Collins CA, Labott SM. Psychological Assessment of Candidates for Solid Organ Transplantation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2007; 38; 2: 150–157.
4. Kern de Castro, Moreno-Jimeґnez B, RodrıґguezCarvajal R. Psychological well-being in adults transplanted in childhood. Pediatr Transplantion. 2007: 11: 272–278.
5. Olbrisch ME, Sharon MB, Ashe K et al. Psychological Assessment and Care of Organ Transplant Patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2002; 70; 3: 771–783.
6. Schroder, Nina M. Consideration of psychological factors in the evolution of living donors / Nina M. Schroder [at al.]. Progress in Transplantation. 2008 Mart; 18 (1): 8–41.
7. Colm CM, Pascual M. Update in Renal Transplantation. (REPRINTED) ARCH INTERN MED. July 12, 2004; 164: 1373–1388.
8. Romano G, Lorenzon E, Montanaro D. Effects of exercise in renal transplant recipients. World J. Transplant. Aug. 24, 2012; 2 (4): 46–50.
9. Wojtasiak E. How patients with end-stage renal disease manage their condition. Annals Academia Medical Bialstocensis. 2005; 50; 1: 129–132.
10. Woodroff R, Yao GL, Meads C et al. Clinical and costeffectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modeling study. Health Technol Assess. 2005; 21: 1–179.
11. Látos M, György A, Lázár G et al. The role of body image integrity and posttraumatic growth in kidney transplantation: A 3-year longitudinal study. Published. May 11, 2015, Doi: 10.1177/2055102915581214 Health psychology open January-June 2015 vol.2 2 no. 12055102915581214.
12. Климушева НФ, Баранская ЛТ, Шмакова ТВ. Психологические факторы развития трансплантологии. Медицинская психология в России: электрон. науч. журн. 2014; 4 (27) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://mprj.ru. Klimusheva NF, Baranskaya LT, Shmakova TV. Psihologicheskie faktory razvitiya transplantologii. Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii: ehlektron. nauch. zhurn. 2014; 4 (27) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://mprj.ru.
13. Баранская ЛТ, Леонов АГ, Блохина СИ. Психологическое сопровождение пациентов с врожденными и приобретенными дефектами и деформациями челюстно-лицевой области. Екатеринбург: «СВ-96», 2005. Baranskaya LT, Leonov AG, Blohina SI. Psihologicheskoe soprovozhdenie pacientov s vrozhdennymi i priobretennymi defektami i deformaciyami chelyustnolicevoj oblasti. Ekaterinburg: «SV-96», 2005.
14. Трансплантация почки / Под ред. T. Kalble, A. Alcaraz, K. Budde et al. М.: АБВ-пресс, 2010. Transplantaciya pochki / Pod red. T. Kalble, A. Alcaraz, K. Budde et al. M.: ABV-press, 2010.
15. Eggeling C. The psychosocial implications of live-related kidney donation. EDTNA ERCA J. 1999 Jul-Sep; 25 (3): 19–22. Pub Med PMID: 10786489.
16. Wojtasiak E. How patients with end-stage renal disease manage their condition. Annals Academia Medical Bialstocensis. 2005; 50; 1: 129–132.
17. Woodroff R, Yao GL, Meads C et al. Clinical and costeffectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modeling study. Health Technol Assess. 2005; 21: 1–179.
18. Климушева НФ. Риск расстройств личностной адаптации у пациентов с трансплантированными внутренними органами / Н.Ф. Климушева, Л.Т. Баранская, Т.В. Шмакова. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2009; 6 (60): 63–69. Klimusheva NF. Risk rasstrojstv lichnostnoj adaptacii u pacientov s transplantirovannymi vnutrennimi organami / N.F. Klimusheva, L.T. Baranskaya, T.V. Shmakova. Ural’skij medicinskij zhurnal. 2009; 6 (60): 63–69.
19. Dew MA, Switzer GE, Goycoolea JM. Does transplantation produce quality of life benefits? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1261.
20. Mooney DJ, Milkos AG. Growing new organs. Scientific American. 1999; 280 (4): 60–65.
21. Morana JG. Psychosocial evaluation and follow-up in liver transplantation. J. World Gastroenterology. Feb. 14, 2009; 15 (6): 694–698.
22. Salmon P, Stanford C, Mikahil G et al. Hemodynamic and emotional responses to a psychological stressor after cardian transplantation. Psychosom. Med. 2002; 63: 289–299.
Review
For citations:
Gautier S.V., Klimusheva N.F. PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND REHABILITATION OF RECIPIENTS OF DONOR ORGANS. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2016;18(2):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2016-2-37-45