Preview

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Advanced search

A comparative study of NIH 3T3 fibroblast adhesion and proliferation on coatings of domestic and wild silk fibroin and their chitosan composites

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-163-172

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity, adhesion, and proliferation of fibroblasts on film coatings made of Bombyx mori silk fibroin, wild silk (Tussah) fibroin, and their chitosan composites. Materials and methods. Four types of film coatings were investigated: Bombyx mori fibroin, wild silk fibroin, and their respective chitosan composites. The coatings were fabricated by casting aqueous polymer solutions followed by drying. Cytotoxicity was assessed in accordance with GOST R ISO 10993-5 using the extract assay method. NIH 3T3 fibroblast adhesion was evaluated 1 hour after seeding, while proliferation was assessed on days 1, 2, and 3 of culture. Cell quantification was performed following nuclear staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) using fluorescence microscopy combined with automated image analysis. Culture dishes containing sterile medium and medium supplemented with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or dimethyl sulfoxide served as control groups. Results. All tested coatings supported fibroblast viability, with metabolic activity levels comparable to those observed on standard culture plastic. Fibroblast adhesion and proliferation were consistently higher on wild silk fibroin coatings compared with Bombyx mori fibroin coatings at all time points. The incorporation of chitosan further enhanced both cell adhesion and proliferation. The most pronounced cellular response was observed on composite coatings based on wild silk fibroin and chitosan. Conclusion. Film coatings based on wild silk fibroin demonstrate an enhanced ability to support fibroblast adhesion and proliferation in vitro – more than twice as high as that of Bombyx mori fibroin with chitosan. Composite systems incorporating chitosan further enhance these properties, making them promising candidates for the development of functional biomedical coatings.

About the Authors

O. Dosi
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. I. Podbolotova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
Russian Federation

Moscow



O. I. Agapova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. E. Efimov
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Moscow



I. I. Agapov
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation

Igor I. Agapov.

1, Shchukinskaya str., Moscow, 123182

Phone: (495) 231-60-42



References

1. Tremel A, Cai A, Tirtaatmadja N, Hughes BD, Stevens GW, Landman KA et al. Cell migration and proliferation during monolayer formation and wound healing. Chem Eng Sci. 2009; 64: 247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.008.

2. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002; 110 (6): 673–687. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6.

3. Parsons JT, Horwitz AR, Schwartz MA. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11: 633–643. doi: 10.1038/nrm2957.

4. Murphy WL, McDevitt TC, Engler AJ. Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat Mater. 2014; 13: 547–557. doi: 10.1038/nmat3937.

5. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003; 24 (3): 401–416. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8.

6. Sahoo JK, Hasturk O, Falcucci T, Kaplan DL. Silk chemistry and biomedical material designs. Nat Rev Chem. 2023; 7: 302–318. doi: 10.1038/s41570-023-00486-x.

7. Hu X, Lu Q, Kaplan DL, Cebe P. Microphase separation controlled β-sheet crystallization kinetics in fibrous proteins. Macromolecules. 2009; 42: 2079–2087. doi: 10.1021/ma802481p.

8. Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, Wang X, Lovett ML, Kaplan DL. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc. 2011; 6 (10): 1612–1631. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.379.

9. Agapova OI, Agapov II. Biodegradiruemye izdelija na osnove fibroina shelka dlya tkanevoj inzhenerii i regenerativnoj meditsiny. M.: Tekhnosfera, 2018: 14–64.

10. Podbolotova EI, Pashutin AR, Grudinin NV, Agapova OI, Efimov AE, Agapov II. Silk-based scaffolds for tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery: mechanical and structural properties. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025; 27 (4): 125–132. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2025-4-125-132.

11. Safonova L, Bobrova M, Efimov A, Lyundup A, Agapova O, Agapov I. A Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Biological Properties of Films and Microfi brous Scaffolds Based on Silk Fibroin. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Sep 26; 13 (10): 1561. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101561.

12. Pashutin A, Podbolotova E, Kirsanova L, Dosi O, Efimov AE, Agapova O, Agapov I. Silk fibroin microparticle/carboxymethyl cellulose composite gel for wound healing applications. Biomimetics. 2025; 10 (7): 434. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10070434.

13. Minoura N, Aiba S, Gotoh Y, Tsukada M, Imai Y. Attachment and growth of cultured fibroblast cells on silk protein matrices. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995; 29: 1215–1221. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820291008.

14. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan – a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011; 36 (8): 981–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001.

15. Ajisawa A. Dissolution of silk fibroin with calcium chloride/ethanol aqueous solution: Studies on the dissolution of silk fibroin. (IX). J Seric Sci Jpn. 1998; 67 (2): 91–94.

16. Zhang H, Li LL, Dai FY, Zhang HH, Ni B, Zhou W et al. Preparation and characterization of silk fibroin as a biomaterial with potential for drug delivery. J Transl Med. 2012, 10: 117. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-117.

17. Safonova LA, Bobrova MM, Agapova OI, Arkhipova AYu., Goncharenko AV, Agapov II. Fibroin silk based films for rat’s full-thickness skin wound regeneration. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2016; 18 (3): 74–84. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2016-3-74-84.

18. Partridge MA, Marcantonio EE. Initiation of attachment and generation of mature focal adhesions by integrin-containing filopodia in cell spreading. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct; 17 (10): 4237–4248. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-06-0496.

19. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, García AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Aug 1; 66 (2): 247–259. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10537. PMID: 12888994.

20. Yadav H, Malviya R, Kaushik N. Chitosan in biomedicine: A comprehensive review of recent developments. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications. 2024; 8: 100551. doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2024.100551.


Review

For citations:


Dosi O., Podbolotova E.I., Agapova O.I., Efimov A.E., Agapov I.I. A comparative study of NIH 3T3 fibroblast adhesion and proliferation on coatings of domestic and wild silk fibroin and their chitosan composites. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2026;28(2):163-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2026-2-163-172

Views: 32

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-1191 (Print)