Development of a cannula device for gas fraction removal in surgical drains
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-4-46-53
Abstract
The development of low-traumatic surgical drains aimed at maximum possible separation of blood and air, is an important trend in modern medicine. The objective of this work is to create an inexpensive, user-friendly and low-traumatic dynamic blood aspiration system (DBAS). The system allows effective separation of blood and air when drawing blood from a wound under vacuum conditions required for blood aspiration. The operating principle of the system is to separate liquid and gas fractions of the blood-air mixture by modifying the blood intake cannula. The effect is achieved by applying the principles of centrifugal forces of a rotating blood-air flow combined with Archimedes lift forces.
About the Authors
A. P. Kuleshov
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arkadiy Kuleshov
1, Shchukinskaya str., Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
Phone: (915) 292-47-98
A. S. Buchnev
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A Drobyshev
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. Yu. Esipova
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. P. Itkin
Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Jones RE, Donald DE, Swan HJ, Harshbarger HG, Kirklin JW, Wood EH. Apparatus of the Gibbon type for mechanical bypass of the heart and lungs; preliminary report. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clinic. 1955; 30: 105–113.
2. Miller BJ. Laboratory work preceding the first clinical application of cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2003; 18: 145–154.
3. Hayashi Y, Kagisaki K, Yamaguchi T, Sakaguchi T, Naka Y, Sawa Y et al. Clinical application of vacuumassisted cardiopulmonary bypass with a pressure relief valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001; 20: 621–626.
4. Mazer CD, Whitlock RP, Fergusson DA, Hall J, BelleyCote E, Connolly K et al. Restrictive or liberal red-cell transfusion for cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 2133–2144.
5. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH. Transfusion and postoperative pneumonia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: effect of the length of storage of transfused red cells. Transfusion. 1999; 39: 701–710.
6. Karamlou T, Schultz JM, Silliman C, Sandquist C, You J, Shen I et al. Using a miniaturized circuit and an asanguineous prime to reduce neutrophil-mediated organ dysfunction following infant cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 6–13; discussion 13–14.
7. Vlaar AP, Juffermans NP. Transfusion-related acute lung injury: a clinical review. Lancet. 2013; 382: 984–994.
8. Taketani S, Sawa Y, Masai T, Ichikawa H, Kagisaki K, Yamaguchi T et al. A novel technique for cardiopulmonary bypass using vacuum system for venous drainage with pressure relief valve: an experimental study. Artif Organs. 1998; 22 (4): 337–341.
9. Chalegre ST, Salerno PR, Salerno LMVO, Melo ARS, Pinheiro AC, Frazão CS et al. Drenagem venosa assistida a vácuo na circulação extracorpórea e necessidade de hemotransfusão: experiência de serviço. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011; 26 (1): 122–127. 10. Zangrillo A, Garozzo FA, Biondi-Zoccai G, Pappalardo F, Monaco F, Crivellari M et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improves short-term outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139 (5): 1162–1169.
10. Nasso G, Costantini C, Petralia A, Del Prete A, Lopriore V, Fattouch K et al. A new extracorporeal vacuumassited device to optimize cardiopulmonary bypass. Comparison with the conventional system. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011; 12 (4): 591–595.
11. Banbury MK, White JA, Blackstone EH, Cosgrove 3rd DM. Vacuum-assisted venous return reduces blood usage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126 (3): 680–687.
12. Bevilacqua S, Matteucci S, Ferrarini M, Kacila M, Ripoli A, Baroni A et al. Biochemical evaluation of vacuumassisted venous drainage: a randomized, prospective study. Perfusion. 2002; 17 (1): 57–61.
13. Nakanishi K, Shichijo T, Shinkawa Y, Takeuchi S, Nakai M, Kato G et al. Usefulness of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for pediatric open-heart surgery in reducing homologous blood transfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001; 20 (2): 233–238.
14. Pappalardo F, Corno C, Franco A, Giardina, Scandroglio AM, Landoni G et al. Reduction of hemodilution in small adults undergoing open heart surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Perfusion. 2007; 22 (5): 317–322.
15. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 1285–1289.
16. LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, Esposito RA, Galloway AC, Derivaux CC et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120: 856–863.
17. Davila RM, Rawles T, Mack MJ. Venoarterial air embolus: a complication of vacuum-assisted venous drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 1369–1371.
18. Burch TM, Locke AQ. Air lock and embolism upon attempted initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass while using vacuum-assisted venous drainage. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26: 468–470.
19. Colangelo N, Torracca L, Lapenna E, Moriggia S, Crescenzi G, Alfieri O. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in extrathoracic cardiopulmonary bypass management during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2006; 21 (6): 361–365.
20. Kiyama H, Imazeki T, Katayama Y, Murai N, Mukouyama M, Yamauti N. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Artif Organs. 2003; 6 (1): 20–24.
21. Murai N, Cho M, Okada S, Chiba T, Saito M, Shioguchi S et al. Venous drainage method for cardiopulmonary bypass in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery: siphon and vacuum-assisted drainage. J Artif Organs. 2005; 8 (2): 91–94.
22. Cirri S, Negri L, Babbini M, Latis G, Khlat B, Tarelli G et al. Haemolysis due to active venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two different techniques. Perfusion. 2001; 16 (4): 313–318.
23. Gregoretti S. Suction-induced hemolysis at various vacuum pressures: implications for intraoperative blood salvage. Transfusion. 1996; 36 (1): 57–60.
24. Lau CL, Posther KE, Stephenson GR, Lodge A, Lawson JH, Darling EM et al. Mini-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass with vacuum assisted venous drainage. Feasibility of an asanguineous prime in the neonate. Perfusion. 1999; 14 (5): 389–396.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kuleshov A.P., Buchnev A.S., Drobyshev A.A., Esipova O.Yu., Itkin G.P. Development of a cannula device for gas fraction removal in surgical drains. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2022;24(4):46-53. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-4-46-53
Views:
355
Email this article 