Evolution of liver donation in Moscow. Movement towards expanded donor selection criteria

The objective of the study was to investigate the evolution and trends in liver donation in the city of Moscow, with special focus on the expansion of liver donor selection criteria for transplantation. Materials and methods. The study included 1,548 effective donors (EDs) in the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020. Their basic characteristics – age and cause of death – are presented. The dynamics of changes in the age groups of donors and the dynamics of the number of ≥60-year-old liver donors were studied. The influence of expanded liver donor selection criteria over the dynamics of the number of transplant surgeries and patient flow on the waiting list was assessed. Results. During the study period, the number of effective liver donors (ELDs) in Moscow increased 4.7-fold. The average age of ELDs increased from 37.1 in 2012 to 48.8 in 2020. There was an absolute prevalence of donors who died from cerebrovascular accident compared with donors who died from traumatic causes, 83.4% vs 16.6%, respectively. Since 2016, there has been a progressive increase in ≥60-year-old liver donors; the number of such donors in 2020 reached 39, accounting for 13.6% of the total pool of EDs. The progressive growth in the number of liver transplants has significantly influenced patient movement on the waiting list. In 2012, there was a 25.2% increase in the number of liver transplants per 100 patients on the waiting list; by 2020, it had reached 86.6%. Conclusion. The results reasonably indicate an increase in liver donation and liver transplantation (LTx) in Moscow. Comparison of Russian data with those of leading foreign donor programs shows that the trends in the donor pool in the context of older age, including ≥60-year-old donors, and shifting causes of donor death towards cerebrovascular diseases are similar. An overall increase in donor activity and expansion of liver donor criteria contributed to an increase in the number of transplants performed per 100 patients on the waiting list, which, in turn, reduced the waiting time for a donor organ and increased the intensity of patient flow on the waiting list.

1. EASL Clinical Guidelines liver transplantation. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). Journal of Hepatology. 2016; 64: 433–485.

2. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O’Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J et al. Еvolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 2012; 57: 675–688.

3. https://www.eurotransplant.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ETP_AR2020_opmaak_LR2.pdf.

4. Gautier SV, Khomyakov SM. Organ donation and transplantation in the Russian Federation in 2020 13th Report from the Registry of the Russian Transplant Society. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2021; 23 (3): 8–34.

5. Khubutiya MS, Zimina LN, Galankina IE, Gulyaev VA, Novruzbekov MS, Olisov OD, Magomedov KM. Morphofunctional evaluation of liver grafts obtained from standard donors and expanded criteria donors. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2018; 10 (2): 87–97.

6. Nuriakhmetov RR, Musin IR, Kornilov MN, Salimgareev IZ, Zagitov AR, Pogadaev VV, Ivanov II. Donors with expanded criteria in the regional liver transplantation program. Bulletin of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2021; 23: 74.

7. Minina MG. Development and implementation of an innovative model of organ donation in healthcare practice. [Dissertation]. Moscow., 2016.

8. Actividad de donacion y trasplante hepatico espana 2021, документ с сайта Organizacion Nacional de Trasplantes, http://www.ont.es.

9. Nemes B, Gaman G, Polak WG, Gelley F, Hara T, Ono S et al. Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation Part I: reviewing the impact of determining factors. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul; 10 (7): 827–839.

10. Mullhaupt B, Dimitroulis D, Gerlach JT, Clavien PA. Hot topics in liver transplantation: organ allocation – extended criteria donor – living donor liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2008; 48 (1): 58–67.

11. Nickkholgh A, Weitz J, Encke J et al. Utilization of extended donor criteria in liver transplantation: a comprehensive review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22 (8): 29–36.

12. http://www.eltr.org., European Liver Transplant Registry.

13. Tenchurina EA, Minina MG. Organizational, medical and epidemiological prerequisites for reviewing donor criteria in heart transplantation. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2020; 22 (3): 43–52.

14. Tenchurina EA, Minina MG. A donor heart scoring model to predict transplant outcomes. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2020; 22 (4): 27–31.

15. Tenchurina E.A. A model of score evaluation of heart donors. [Dissertation]. Moscow, 2021.

16. Kwong AJ, Ebel NH, Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Schladt DP et al. OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Liver. Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar; 22 Suppl 2: 204–309.

17. Bruzzone P, Giannarelli D, Adam R. Preliminary European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association – European Liver Transplant Registry Study on Informed Recipient Consent and Extended Criteria Liver Donation. Transplantation Proceedings. 2013; 45 (7): 2613–2615.