References

vtio

Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов

Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

1995-1191

Academician V.I.Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

10.15825/1995-1191-2018-2-100-111

vtio-888

Research Article

Обзор литературы

Literature Reviews

ПОЛИМЕРНЫЕ ПРОТЕЗЫ КЛАПАНОВ СЕРДЦА: СОСТОЯНИЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ

POLYMERIC HEART VALVE PROSTHESES: CONDITION AND PERSPECTIVES

Резвова

М. А.

Rezvova

M. A.

650002, Кемерово, Сосновый бульвар, 6.

6, Sosnoviy blvd, 650002, Kemerovo.

rezvovamaria@mail.ru

Овчаренко

Е. А.

Ovcharenko

E. A.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний».РоссияFederal State Budgetary Scientiﬁ c Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases.Russian Federation

2018

27062018

202100111

2018

Резвова М.А., Овчаренко Е.А.

Rezvova M.A., Ovcharenko E.A.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/888

Идея создания полимерного клапана сердца, обладающего высокой прочностью и биосовместимостью, берет свое начало в 60-х годах. С тех пор исследовано множество полимерных соединений, однако так и не было найдено решение данной проблемы. В последние годы в связи с развитием технологий синтеза высокомолекулярных соединений появились новые полимеры, обладающие потенциалом для решения данной проблемы, о чем свидетельствует ряд публикаций, описывающих экспериментальные и клинические данные. Тем не менее поиск полимера для основы створчатого аппарата протеза клапана сердца не теряет своей актуальности ввиду изученных недостатков и отсутствия доказательной базы, подтверждающей долгосрочную безопасность таких изделий. В настоящем обзоре представлены первые результаты исследования полимерных протезов клапанов сердца на основе нанокомпозитного полимера из полиэдрических олигомерных силсесквиоксановых наночастиц и поликарбонатномочевинного уретанового полимера POSS-PCU, поли(стирол-блок-изобутилен-блок-стирола) – SIBS, политетрафторэтилена PTFE и др., возможность получения новых сополимеров и композитов на базе полимеров олефинового ряда и полиэстеров, продемонстрирована идея создания материала с заданной трехмерной микроархитектурой, определяющей анизотропию и необходимые механические свойства.

The idea of creating a polymer heart valve, which has high strength and biocompatibility, occurs in the 60’s. Since then, many polymer compounds have been investigated, but no solution has been found for this problem. In recent years, in connection with the development of technologies for the synthesis of high-molecular compounds, new polymers have appeared that can solve this problem, as evidenced by a number of publications describing experimental and clinical data. Nevertheless, the search for a polymer for the valve stem of the valvular valve body does not lose its relevance due to the deﬁ ciencies studied and the lack of evidence conﬁ rming the long-term safety of such products. This review presents the ﬁ rst results of a study of polymer heart valves prostheses based on a nanocomposite polymer from polyhedral oligomeric nanoparticles of silicosioxane and polycarbonate urethane polymer POSS-PCU, polystyrene block-isobutylene-block-styrene SIBS, PTFE polytetraﬂ uoroethylene, copolymers and composites based on oleﬁ n polymers series and polyesters, the idea of creating a material with a given three-dimensional microarchitecture that determines the anisotropy and the necessary mechanical properties.

полимерный протез клапана сердцаполи(стирол-блок-изобутилен-блок-стирол)полиэдральный олигомерный силсесквиоксан

heart valve prosthesispoly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene)polytetraﬂ uoroethylenePOSS-PCU polymer

References1

Chambers J. Prosthetic heart valves. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2014; 68 (10): 1227–1230. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12309. PMID: 24423099.

Lee S, Levy RJ, Christian AJ, Hazen SL, Frick NE, Lai EK et al. Calciﬁ cation and oxidative modiﬁ cations are associated with progressive bioprosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease. 2017; 6 (5): e005648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005648.

Manji RA, Ekser B, Menkis AH, Cooper DKC. Bioprosthetic heart valves of the future. Xenotransplantation. 2014; 21 (1): 1–10. Doi:10.1111/xen.12080. PMCID: PMC4890621.

Singhal P, Adriana L, Butany J. Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Impact of Implantation on Biomaterials. ISRN Biomaterials. 2013; Article ID 728791: 14. Doi: 10.5402/2013/728791.

Jaffer IH, Whitlock RP. A mechanical heart valve is the best choice. Heart. Asia. 2016; 8 (1): 62–64. Doi: 10.1136/ heartasia-2015-010660. PMCID: PMC4898622.

Gürsoy MO, Kalçık M, Yesin M, Karakoyun S, Bayam E, Gündüz S et al. A global perspective on mechanical prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology. 2016; 16 (12): 980–989. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7486. PMCID: PMC5324921.

Yee HK, Lakshmi D, Ajit Y, Hwa L. Recent Advances in Polymeric Heart Valves Research. International Journal of Biomaterials Research and Engineering. 2011; 1: 1–17. doi: 10.4018/ijbre.2011010101.

Овчаренко ЕА. Влияние конструктивных особенностей на клинические результаты имплантации транскатетерных биопротезов клапана аорты. Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2014; 173 (5): 86–90.

Ovcharenko EA. Vlijanie konstruktivnyh osobennostej na klinicheskie rezul’taty implantacii transkateternyh bioprotezov klapana aorty. Vestnik hirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2014; 173 (5): 86–90.

Lee S, Levy RJ, Christian AJ et al. Calciﬁ cation and Oxidative Modiﬁ cations Are Associated With Progressive Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease. 2017; 6 (5): e005648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005648.

Niclauss L, von Segesser LK, Ferrari E. Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a ﬂ exible age limit? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2013; 16 (4): 501–507. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs514.

Cheung DY, Duan B, Butcher JT. Current progress in tissue engineering of heart valves: multiscale problems, multiscale solutions. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2015; 15 (8): 1155–1172. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1051527. PubMed PMID: 26027436.

Ghanbari H, Viatge H, Kidane AG, Burriesci G, Tavakoli M, Seifalian AM. Polymeric heart valves: new materials, emerging hopes. Trends in Biotechnology. 2009; 27 (6): 359–367. PMID: 19406497. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.002.

Bezuidenhout D, Williams DF, Zilla P. Polymeric heart valves for surgical implantation, catheter-based technologies and heart assist devices. Biomaterials. 2015; 36: 6–25. PMID: 25443788. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.013.

Левашов НВ. Протез митрального клапана с односторонней фиксацией: Авт. св. № 122249, заявл. 29.12.1958, опубл. 1959 // Бюл. изобр. 1959; 17.

Levashov NV. Protez mitral’nogo klapana s odnostoronnej ﬁ ksaciej: Avt. sv. № 122249, zajavl. 29.12.1958, opubl. 1959 // Bjul. izobr. 1959; 17.

Колесников СА, Цукерман ГИ, Голиков ГТ и др. Полное протезирование митрального клапана. Грудн. хирургия. 1964; 4: 16–19.

Kolesnikov SA, Cukerman GI, Golikov GT i dr. Polnoe protezirovanie mitral’nogo klapana. Grudn. hirurgija. 1964; 4: 16–19.

Цукерман ВИ (ред.) Протезирование клапанов сердца. Научный обзор. М., 1971.

Cukerman VI (red.) Protezirovanie klapanov serdca. Nauchnyj obzor. M., 1971.

Roe BB, Kelly JPB, Myers JL, Moore DW. Tricuspid leaflet aortic valve prosthesis. Circulation. 1960; 33: 1124– 1130. PMID: 5933586.

Chetta GE, Lloyd JR. The design, fabrication and evaluation prosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech. Eng. 1980; 102: 34–41. PMID: 7382451.

Braunwald NS, Morrow AG. A late evaluation of ﬂ exible teﬂ on prostheses utilized for total aortic valve replacement. Postoperative clinical, hemodynamic, and pathological assessments. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1965; 49: 485–496. PMID: 14265964.

Nistal F, García-Martínez V, Arbe E, Fernández D, Artiñano E, Mazorra F et al. In vivo experimental assessment of polytetraﬂ uoroethylene trileaﬂ et heart valve prosthesis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1990 Jun; 99 (6): 1074–1081. PMID: 2359324.

Ando M, Takahashi Y. Ten-year experience with handmade trileaﬂ et polytetraﬂ uoroethylene valved conduit used for pulmonary reconstruction. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009; 137: 124–131. PMID: 19154914. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.060.

Yamagishi M, Kurosawa H, Nomura K, Kitamura N. Fan-shaped expanded polytetraﬂ uoroethylene valve in the pulmonary position. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2002; 43: 779–786. PMID: 12483166.

Yamagishi M, Kurosawa H. Outﬂ ow reconstruction of tetralogy of Fallot using a Gore-Tex valve. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993; 56: 1414–1417. PMID: 8267454.

Miyazaki T, Yamagishi M, Maeda Y, Yamamoto Y, Taniguchi S, Sasaki Y et al. Expanded polytetraﬂ uoroethylene conduits and patches with bulging sinuses and fan-shaped valves in right ventricular outﬂ ow tract reconstruction: Multicenter study in Japan. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011; 142: 1122–1129. PMID: 21908008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.018.

Lee C, Lee CH, Kwak JG. Polytetraﬂ uoroethylene bicuspid pulmonary valve replacement: A 5-year experience in 119 patients with congenital heart disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016; 102 (1): 163–169. PMID: 27083247. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.056.

Quintessenza JA, Jacobs JP, Chai PJ, Morell VO, Lindberg H. Polytetraﬂ uoroethylene bicuspid pulmonary valve implantation: experience with 126 patients. World. J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart. Surg. 2010; 1 (1): 20–27. PMID: 23804719. DOI: 10.1177/2150135110361509.

Базылев ВВ, Воеводин АБ, Раджабов ДА, Россейкин ЕВ. Первый опыт трансапикальной имплантации протеза аортального клапана «МедИнж». Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2016; 17 (6): 141.

Bazylev VV, Voevodin AB, Radzhabov DA, Rossejkin EV. Pervyj opyt transapikal’noj implantacii proteza aortal’nogo klapana «MedInzh». Bjulleten’ NCSSH im. A.N. Bakuleva RAMN. Serdechno-sosudistye zabolevanija. 2016; 17 (6): 141.

Daebritz SH, Fausten B, Hermanns B, Franke A, Schroeder J, Groetzner J et al. New ﬂ exible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions. Heart. Surg. Forum. 2004; 7 (5): 525–532. PMID: 15799940. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20041083.

Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner AJ. Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: in vivo and in vitro correlations. Biomed Mater Res A. 2004; 70 (2): 245–255. PMID: 15227669. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30067.

Christenson EM, Dadsetan M, Wiggins M, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: in vivo studies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2004; 69: 407–416. PMID: 15127387. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30002.

Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Enzyme-induced biodegradation of polycarbonate-polyurethanes: dependence on hard-segment chemistry. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001; 57: 597–611. PMID: 11400129.

Jiang H, Campbell G, Boughner D, Wand WK, Quantz M. Design and manufacture of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogel tri-leaﬂ et heart valve prosthesis. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2004; 26: 269–277. PMID: 15121052. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2003.10.007.

Mohammadi H, Boughner D, Millon LE, Wan WK. Design and simulation of a poly(vinyl alcohol)–bacterial cellulose nanocomposite mechanical aortic heart valve prosthesis. Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine. 2009; 223: 697–711. PMID: 19743636. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM493.

Gallocher SL, Aguirre AF, Kasyanov V, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. A novel polymer for potential use in a trileaﬂ et heart valve. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 2006; 79 (2): 325–334. PMID: 16649171. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30546.

Pinchuk L, Wilson GJ, Barry JJ, Schoephoerster RT, Parel JM, Kennedy JP. Medical applications of poly(styreneblock-isobutylene-block-styrene) («SIBS»). Biomaterials. 2008; 29 (4): 448–460. PMID: 17980425. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.041.

Fray ME, Prowans P, Puskas JE, Altsta V. Biocompatibility and Fatigue Properties of Polystyrene-Polyisobutylene-Polystyrene, an Emerging Thermoplastic Elastomeric Biomaterial. Biomacromolecules. 2006; 7: 844–850. PMID: 16529422. doi: 10.1021/bm050971c.

Claiborne TE, Xenos M, Sheriff J, Chiu WC, Soares J, Alemu Y et al. Toward optimization of a novel trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve via device thrombogenicity emulation. ASAIO J. 2013; 59 (3): 275–283. PMID: 23644615. PMCID: PMC3648888. doi: 10.1097/ MAT.0b013e31828e4d80.

Sheriff J, Claiborne TE, Tran PL, Kothadia R, George S, Kato YP et al. Physical Characterization and Platelet Interactions under Shear Flows of a Novel Thermoset Polyisobutylene-based Co-polymer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015; 7 (39): 22058–22066. PMID: 26398588. PMCID: PMC4608843. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b07254.

Claiborne TE, Sheriff J, Kuetting M, Steinseifer U, Slepian MJ, Bluestein DJ. In vitro evaluation of a novel hemodynamically optimized trileaﬂ et polymeric prosthetic heart valve. Biomech. Eng. 2013; 135 (2): 021021. PMID: 23445066. PMCID: PMC5413125. doi: 10.1115/1.4023235.

Simmonsa A, Hyvarinena J, Odella RA, Martinc DJ, Gunatillakeb PA, Noblea KR et al. Long-term in vivo biostability of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/ poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomers. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 4887–4900. PMID: 15109849. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.004.

Dabagh M, Abdekhodaie MJ, Khorasani MT. Effects of Polydimethylsiloxane grafting on the calciﬁ cation, physical properties, and biocompatibility of polyurethane in a heart valve. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2005; 98: 758–766. doi: 10.1002/app.22132.

Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Butler PE, Seifalian AM. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocomposites: the next generation material for biomedical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005; 38: 879–884. PMID: 16285710. doi: 10.1021/ar050055b.

Kidane AG, Burriesci G, Edirisinghe M, Ghanbari H, Bonhoeffer P et al. A novel nanocomposite polymer for development of synthetic heart valve leaﬂ ets. Acta Biomaterialia 2009; 5: 2409–2417. PMID: 19497802. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.025.

Ghanbari H, Kidane AG, Burriesci G, Ramesh B, Darbyshir A, Seifalian AM. The anti-calciﬁ cation potential of a silsesquioxane nanocomposite polymer under in vitro conditions: Potential material for synthetic leaﬂ et heart valve. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010; 6: 4249–4260. PMID: 20601232. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.015.

Цукерман ГИ. Развитие хирургии приобретенных пороков сердца в Научном центре сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева. Грудн. хирургия. 1999; 6: 20–29.

Cukerman GI. Razvitie hirurgii priobretjonnyh porokov serdca v Nauchnom centre serdechno-sosudistoj hirurgii im. A.N. Bakuleva. Grudn. hirurgija. 1999; 6: 20–29.

Евдокимов СВ, Филиппов АН, Гончаров ЭВ. Эволюция протеза клапана сердца «Мединж». Протезы клапанов сердца «Мединж» в хирургии клапанных пороков сердца. 2004; 134–143.

Evdokimov SV, Filippov AN, Goncharov JeV. Jevoljucija proteza klapana serdca «Medinzh». Protezy klapanov serdca «Medinzh» v hirurgii klapannyh porokov serdca. 2004; 134–143.

Nosal M, Poruban R, Valentík P, Sagat M, Nagi AS, Kantorova A. Initial experience with polytetraﬂ uoroethylene leaﬂ et extensions for aortic valve repair. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2012; 41: 1255–1258. PMID: 22241004. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr214.

Zhang B, Chen X, Xu T, Zhang Z, Li X, Han L et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement by hybrid approach using a novel polymeric prosthetic heart valve: proof of concept in sheep. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9 (6): e100065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100065.

Turmanova S, Minchev M, Vassilev K, Danev G. Surface grafting polymerization of vinyl monomers on poly(tetraﬂ uoroethylene) ﬁ lms by plasma treatment. Journal of Polymer Research. 2008; 15 (4): 309–318. doi: 10.1007/s10965-007-9172-0.

Gupta B, Plummera C, Bisson I, Frey P, Hilborn J. Plasma-induced graft polymerization of acrylic acid onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) ﬁ lms: characterization and human smoothmuscle cell growthon grafted ﬁ lms. Biomaterials. 2002; 23: 863–871. doi: 10.1016/S01429612(01)00195-8.

Hoshia RA, Litha RV, Jena MC, Allenb JB, Lapidosa KA, Ameera G. The blood and vascular cell compatibility of heparin-modiﬁ ed ePTFE vascular grafts. Biomaterials. 2013; 34 (1): 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j. biomaterials.2012.09.046. PMID: 23069711. PMCID: PMC4065598.

Montaño-Machado V, Chevallier P, Mantovani D, Pauthe E. On the potential forﬁ bronectin/phosphorylcholine coatings on PTFE substrates to jointly modulate endothelial cell adhesion and hemocompatibility properties. Biomatter. 2015; 5: e979679. PMID: 25785369. PMCID: PMC4581125. doi: 10.4161/21592535.2014.979679.

Braunwald NS, Cooper T, Morrow AG. Complete replacement of the mitral valve. Successful clinical application of a ﬂ exible polyurethane prosthesis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1960; 40: 1–11. PMID: 13804040.

Wheatleya DJ, Raco L, Bernacca GM, Sim I, Belchera PR, Boyd JS. Polyurethane: material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2000; 17: 440–448. PMID: 10773568.

Bernacca GM, Mackay TG, Wilkinson R, Wheatley DJ. Polyurethane heart valves: fatigue failure, calcifcation and polyurethane structure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997; 34: 371–379. PMID: 9086407.

Kütting M, Roggenkamp J, Urban U, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U. Polyurethane heart valves: past, present and future. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices. 2011; 8: 227–233. PMID: 21381912. doi: 10.1586/erd.10.79.

Stokes K, McVenes R, Anderson JM. Polyurethane elastomer biostability. J. Biomater. 1995; 9 (4): 321–354. PMID: 9309503. doi: 10.1177/088532829500900402.

Santerre JP, Woodhouse K, Laroche G, Labow RS. Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: from classical implants to tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005; 26 (35): 7457–7470. PMID: 16024077 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079.

Sachweh JS, Daebritz SH. Novel «biomechanical» polymeric valve prostheses with special design for aortic and mitral position: a future option for pediatric patients? ASAIO J. 2006; 52 (5): 575–580. PMID: 16966862. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000237695.87457.2a.

Daebritz SH, Fausten B, Hermanns B, Schroeder J, Groetzner J, Autschbach R et al. Introduction of a ﬂ exible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004; 25: 946–952. PMID: 15144993. doi: 10.1016/j. ejcts.2004.02.040.

Mohammadi H. Nanocomposite biomaterial mimicking aortic heart valve leaﬂ et mechanical behaviour. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 2011; 225: 718e22. PMID: 15144993. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.040.

Mohammadi H, Boughner D, Millon LE, Wan WK. Design and simulation of a poly(vinyl alcohol)-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite mechanical aortic heart valve prosthesis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 2009; 223: 697– 711. PMID: 19743636. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM493.

Cacciola G, Peters GW, Baaijens FP. A synthetic ﬁ berreinforced stentless heart valve. J. Biomech. 2000; 33: 653–658. PMID: 10807985.

Claiborne TE, Slepian MJ, Hossainy S, Bluestein D. Polymeric trileaﬂ et prosthetic heart valves: evolution and path to clinical reality. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices. 2012; 9 (6): 577–594. doi:10.1586/erd.12.51. PMID: 23249154. PMCID: PMC3570260.

Wang Q, McGoron AJ, Bianco R, Kato Y, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. In vivo assessment of a novel polymer (SIBS) trileaﬂ et heart valve. J. Heart. Valve Dis. 2010; 19: 499–505. PMID: 20845899.

Duraiswamy N, Choksi TD, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. A phospholipid-modiﬁ ed polystyrene-polyisobutylene-polystyrene (SIBS) triblock polymer for enhanced emocompatibility and potential use in artiﬁ cial heart valves. J. Biomater. Appl. 2009; 23 (4): 367–379. doi: 10.1177/0885328208093854.

Brubert J, Krajewski S, Wende HP, Nair S, Stasiak J, Moggridge GD. Hemocompatibility of styrenic block copolymers for use in prosthetic heart valves. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med. 2016; 27: 32. PMID: 26704549. PMCID: PMC4690832. doi: 10.1007/s10856-0155628-7.

Claiborne TE, Girdhar G, Gallocher-Lowe S, Sheriff J, Kato YP, Pinchuk L et al. Thrombogenic potential of Innovia polymer valves versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic bioprosthetic valves. ASAIO J. 2011; 57 (1): 26–31 PMID: 20930618. doi: 10.1097/ MAT.0b013e3181fcbd86.

Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, Shusteff M, DeOtte J, Duoss EB et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014; 344 (6190): 1373–1377. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252291. PubMed PMID: 24948733.

Smith M, Cantwell WJ, Guan Z, Tsopanos S, Theobald MD, Nurick GN et al. The quasi-static and blast response of steel lattice structures. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials. 2011; 13 (4): 479–501. doi: 10.1177/1099636210388983.

Hawreliak JA, Lind J, Maddox B, Barham M, Messner M, Barton N et al. Dynamic Behavior of Engineered Lattice Materials. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 28094. DOI: 10.1038/ srep28094. PubMed PMID: 27321697. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4913358.

Zheng X, Smith W, Jackson J, Moran B, Cui H, Chen D, Ye J et al. Multiscale metallic metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2016; 15 (10): 1100–1106. doi: 10.1038/nmat4694. PubMed PMID: 27429209.

Jang D, Meza LR, Greer F, Greer JR. Fabrication and deformation of three-dimensional hollow ceramic nanostructures. Nat. Mater. 2013; 12 (10): 893–898. doi: 10.1038/nmat3738. PubMed PMID: 23995324.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.