vtioВестник трансплантологии и искусственных органовRussian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs1995-1191Academician V.I.Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation10.15825/1995-1191-2012-2-110-115vtio-170Research ArticleОбзор литературыLiterature ReviewsОСОБЕННОСТИ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ МЕХАНИЧЕСКОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ КРОВООБРАЩЕНИЯ С ПОМОЩЬЮ НАСОСОВ НЕПРЕРЫВНОГО ПОТОКАFEATURES OF LONG-TERM MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT WITH CONTINUOUS-FLOW PUMPИткинГ. П.ItkinG. P.ШохинаЕ. Г.ShokhinaE. G.ШемакинС. Ю.ShemakinS. Y.ПопцовВ. Н.PoptsovV. N.ШумаковД. В.ShumakovD. V.ГотьеС. В.GautierS. V.ФГБУ «ФНЦ трансплантологии и искусственных органов им. академика В.И. Шумакова» Минздравсоцразвития России, г. МоскваAcademician V.I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow201228052014142ВЕСТНИК ТРАНСПЛАНТОЛОГИИ И ИСКУССТВЕННЫХ ОРГАНОВ том XIV No 2–2012110115Copyright © Иткин Г.П., Шохина Е.Г., Шемакин С.Ю., Попцов В.Н., Шумаков Д.В., Готье С.В., 20122012Иткин Г.П., Шохина Е.Г., Шемакин С.Ю., Попцов В.Н., Шумаков Д.В., Готье С.В.Itkin G.P., Shokhina E.G., Shemakin S.Y., Poptsov V.N., Shumakov D.V., Gautier S.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/170

В обзоре проведен сравнительный анализ методов и средств для длительной механической поддержки кровообращения с помощью имплантируемых насосов непрерывного и пульсирующего потока. Особое внимание уделено выбору оптимальных режимов работы насосов с учетом физических принципов взаи- модействия стационарного потока крови с пульсирующей механикой камер сердца. 

In a review of the comparative analysis of methods and tools for long-term mechanical circulatory support with continuous flow and pulsatile flow implantable pumps. Particular attention is paid to the choice of the optimal modes of the operation of pumps based on the physical principles of the interaction between a the steady flow of blood to the pulsatile mechanics of the heart chambers. 

левожелудочковый обходнасосы пульсирующего потоканасосы непрерывного потокаскорость вращения ротора насосахроническая сердечная недостаточностьLeft ventricular bypasspulsatile fl ow pumpcontinuous fl ow pumprotor speedchronic heart failureReferencesSlaughter M.S., Rogers J.G., Milano C.A., Russell S.D. et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 2241–2251.Slaughter M.S., Rogers J.G., Milano C.A., Russell S.D. et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 2241–2251.John R. Current axial-flow devices – the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 264–272.John R. Current axial-flow devices – the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 264–272.Fang J.C. Rise of the machines – left ventricular assist devices as permanent therapy for advanced heart failu- re // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 1–3.Fang J.C. Rise of the machines – left ventricular assist devices as permanent therapy for advanced heart failu- re // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 1–3.Frazier O.H., Jacob L.P. Small Pumps for Ventricular Assistance: Progress in Mechanical Circulatory // Cardi- ol. Clin. 2007. P. 253–256.Frazier O.H., Jacob L.P. Small Pumps for Ventricular Assistance: Progress in Mechanical Circulatory // Cardi- ol. Clin. 2007. P. 253–256.John R., Naka Y., Smedira N.G., Starling R., et al. Con- tinuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 Oct. Vol. 92 (4). P. 1406–1413.John R., Naka Y., Smedira N.G., Starling R., et al. Con- tinuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 Oct. Vol. 92 (4). P. 1406–1413.Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. P. 312–321.Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. P. 312–321.Fonarow G.C., Heywood J.T. et al. Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for heart failu- re hospitalisations, 2002 to 2004: findings from Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (AD- HERE) // Am. Heart. J. 2007. Vol. 153 (6). P. 1021–1028.Fonarow G.C., Heywood J.T. et al. Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for heart failu- re hospitalisations, 2002 to 2004: findings from Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (AD- HERE) // Am. Heart. J. 2007. Vol. 153 (6). P. 1021–1028.Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.Miller L.W., Pagani F.D., Russell S.D. et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart trans- plantation // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 357. P. 885–896.Miller L.W., Pagani F.D., Russell S.D. et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart trans- plantation // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 357. P. 885–896.Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. Vol. 312–321.Pagani F.D., Miller L.W., Russell S.D. et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device // J. Am. Coll. Cardi- ol. 2009. Vol. 54. Vol. 312–321.Radovancevic B., Vrtovec B., de Kort E. et al. End-or- gan function in patients on long-term circulatory sup- port with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2007. Vol. 26 (8). P. 815– 818.Radovancevic B., Vrtovec B., de Kort E. et al. End-or- gan function in patients on long-term circulatory sup- port with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2007. Vol. 26 (8). P. 815– 818.John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to- transplant therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 1227–1234; discussion 34–35.John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to- transplant therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 1227–1234; discussion 34–35.Patel N.D., Weiss E.S., Schaffer J. et al. Right Heart Dys- function After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implan- tation: A Comparison of the Pulsatile HeartMate I and Axial-Flow HeartMate II Devices // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 832–840.Patel N.D., Weiss E.S., Schaffer J. et al. Right Heart Dys- function After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implan- tation: A Comparison of the Pulsatile HeartMate I and Axial-Flow HeartMate II Devices // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 86. P. 832–840.Westaby S., Siegenthaler M., Beyersdorf F. et al. Destina- tion therapy with a rotary blood pump and novel power delivery // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010 Feb. Vol. 37 (2). P. 350–356.Westaby S., Siegenthaler M., Beyersdorf F. et al. Destina- tion therapy with a rotary blood pump and novel power delivery // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010 Feb. Vol. 37 (2). P. 350–356.Lietz K. Destination Therapy: Patient Selection and Cur- rent Outcomes // J. Card. Surg. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 462–471.Lietz K. Destination Therapy: Patient Selection and Cur- rent Outcomes // J. Card. Surg. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 462–471.Westaby S., Frazier O.H., Banning A. Six Years of Con- tinuous Mechanical Circulatory Support // N. Engl. J.Westaby S., Frazier O.H., Banning A. Six Years of Con- tinuous Mechanical Circulatory Support // N. Engl. J.Med. 2006. Vol. 355 (3). P. 326–328.Med. 2006. Vol. 355 (3). P. 326–328.Garatti A., Bruschi G., Colombo T., Russo C. et al. Clini-Garatti A., Bruschi G., Colombo T., Russo C. et al. Clini-cal outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricu- lar assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices // Eur. J. Car- diothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 275–280.cal outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricu- lar assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices // Eur. J. Car- diothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 275–280.Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.Feller E.D., Sorensen E.N., Haddad M. et al. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83 (3). P. 1082–1088.Slaughter M.S., Pagani F.D., Rogers J.G. et al. Clini- cal management of continuous-flow left ventricular as- sist devices in advanced heart failure // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2010 Apr. Vol. 29 (4 Suppl). P. S1–39.Slaughter M.S., Pagani F.D., Rogers J.G. et al. Clini- cal management of continuous-flow left ventricular as- sist devices in advanced heart failure // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2010 Apr. Vol. 29 (4 Suppl). P. S1–39.Myers T.J., Bolmers M., Gregoric I.D., Kar B., Fra- zier O.H. Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2009. Vol. 28. P. 423–427.Myers T.J., Bolmers M., Gregoric I.D., Kar B., Fra- zier O.H. Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2009. Vol. 28. P. 423–427.Mudd J.O., Cuda J.D., Halushka M. et al. Fusion of aor- tic valve commissures in patients supported by a conti- nuous axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 1269–1274.Mudd J.O., Cuda J.D., Halushka M. et al. Fusion of aor- tic valve commissures in patients supported by a conti- nuous axial flow left ventricular assist device // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 1269–1274.Letsou G.V., Connelly J.H., Delgado R.M. et al. Is native aortic valve commissural fusion in patients with long- term left ventricular assist devices associated with cli- nically important aortic insufficiency? // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 395–399.Letsou G.V., Connelly J.H., Delgado R.M. et al. Is native aortic valve commissural fusion in patients with long- term left ventricular assist devices associated with cli- nically important aortic insufficiency? // J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 395–399.Ochiai Y., McCarthy P.M., Smedira N.G. et al. Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 pati- ents // Circulation. 2002. Vol. 106. P. I198–202.Ochiai Y., McCarthy P.M., Smedira N.G. et al. Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 pati- ents // Circulation. 2002. Vol. 106. P. I198–202.Struber M., Sander K., Lahpor J. et al. HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 289–294.Struber M., Sander K., Lahpor J. et al. HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 289–294.Amir O., Bracey A.W., Smart F.W. et al. A successful anti- coagulation protocol for the first HeartMate II implantati- on in the United States // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2005. Vol. 32. P. 399–401.Amir O., Bracey A.W., Smart F.W. et al. A successful anti- coagulation protocol for the first HeartMate II implantati- on in the United States // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2005. Vol. 32. P. 399–401.John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular as- sist device // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 136. P. 1318–1323.John R., Kamdar F., Liao K. et al. Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular as- sist device // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 136. P. 1318–1323.Frazier O.H., Delgado R.M., Kar B. et al. First clinical use of the redesigned HeartMate II left ventricular assist system in the United States: a case report // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2004. Vol. 31. P. 157–159.Frazier O.H., Delgado R.M., Kar B. et al. First clinical use of the redesigned HeartMate II left ventricular assist system in the United States: a case report // Tex. Heart. Inst. J. 2004. Vol. 31. P. 157–159.Frazier O.H., Myers T.J., Jarvik R.K. et al. Research and development of an implantable axial-flow left ventricu- lar assist device: the Jarvik 2000 Heart // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71. Suppl. 3. P. S125–S132.Frazier O.H., Myers T.J., Jarvik R.K. et al. Research and development of an implantable axial-flow left ventricu- lar assist device: the Jarvik 2000 Heart // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71. Suppl. 3. P. S125–S132.Westaby S., Jarvik R., Freeland A. et al. Postauricular percutaneous power delivery for permanent mechanical circulatory support // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 977–983.Westaby S., Jarvik R., Freeland A. et al. Postauricular percutaneous power delivery for permanent mechanical circulatory support // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 977–983.Siegenthaler M.P., Martin J., Pernice K. et al. The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMa- te left ventricular assist device // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 23. P. 748–754.Siegenthaler M.P., Martin J., Pernice K. et al. The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMa- te left ventricular assist device // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 23. P. 748–754.Saleem Haj-Yahia S., Birks E.J., Rogers P. et al. Midterm experience with the Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricu- lar assist device // J. Thorac. and Cardiovasc. Surgery. 2011. Vol. 134 (1201). P. 199–203.Saleem Haj-Yahia S., Birks E.J., Rogers P. et al. Midterm experience with the Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricu- lar assist device // J. Thorac. and Cardiovasc. Surgery. 2011. Vol. 134 (1201). P. 199–203.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.